33 comments Add a comment
My experience recently went like this. I had a job interview in London, to which I needed to travel from Devon. I checked train times, and found that the earliest train arrival was 08:49 into Paddington. I agreed an interview time of 09:45 as the location of the interview is 30 minutes by tube from Paddington, and my past experience of this early train is that it is generally 5-10 minutes late due to volume of trains waiting for platforms at Paddington, and I did not want to be rushed.
On arrival at my local train station at 6am (for a 6:25 train) I noticed that the departures board showed all eastbound trains somewhat delayed - all around 20 mins. Two earlier scheduled, but slower trains were still waiting to depart. I therefore asked at both the ticket office and the station manager whether I should board the first departing slow train, or wait for the 'fast' service I was booked on. Both said that the delays were due to over-running engineering works and all 3 would be 20 mins late, so first to my destination was still the fast train.
Fine I thought. I waited, and watched the other 2 trains depart. As the second one pulled out of the station - the delay time suddenly changed on the board! My train was now expected 30 minutes late. By the time it actually departed it was 40 mins behind, then when we passed Taunton, it was an hour late. No information was given on boards, until the ticket collector came round after Taunton (next stop Reading, so chance to change trains). He informed me that we were now expected in London an hour and a half late as we had 'lost our place' in the train queue and one of our engines had failed.
I know my rights under the passenger charter...
Okay, so now I had to rearrange an interview, quite possibly affecting my chances of getting this job. Not the fault of the people that day, so I thought I would take it up with First Group customer services. I sent some rather angry feedback via their website and after only 3 days, received a response. A completely stock response, "Sorry to hear you are unhappy, we will refund the single journey ticket price." I know my rights under the passenger charter, and had already requested a refund through the website where I booked the ticket. What I had asked for and didn't receive, was some detail on what the company had actually learned from this incident and what they are going to do about changing things for the better. A pretty standard practice nowadays in dealing with feedback.
What I received next was a list of the train company's wonderful achievements. Reliability up, trains on time and prices cut!! It as if this was calculated specifically to annoy me. I am not sure exactly what factoring is done to produce this complete rubbish, but I believe that trains which are less than and hour late don't even count towards the company failure rate. So a train that is 55 minutes late is negligible to them! Am I the only person who believes that on time should mean ON TIME?
I am still awaiting a response again from First Great Western, to see if anything has been learnt from this experience - but I don't hold out great hopes. I am an environmentally conscious person and would prefer to use train travel for business (I can't afford it for personal travel these days). But the complete lack of reliability of the train service providers means that unless I have a number of hours lee-way for delays, it is not a viable method of travel.
I have written to my MP about this in the hopes that the government (who supposedly want us to go green and use cars less, and who still subsidise our railways to the tune of many millions of pounds a year) might re-nationalise our railways and sack the current batch of incompetents who run them at the moment.
By: Anna
Leave a comment
I have been suffering the daily horror of First Great Western now for seven years - have decided to move rather than continue as am sure the daily stress is too much.
Wednesday 19th, cancellations and turmoil on usual 7.15 from Kingham. So 20th decided to get 5.56, what a surprise train cancelled and disruption to all main commuter services.
So instead, went to Banbury where there is a brilliant, cheaper, non reserved and altogether more pleasant service. Advise you all to try!!
its an absolute joke - and im sure against health and safety regs that an entire carridge is left empty on a train where people hardly have room to stand.
I could just about deal with the late and crowded trains - but FGW staff are at best rude and unhelpfull and frequently aggressive and from a female point of view - often intimidating.
perhaps im old fashioned - but on numerous occaisions when there has been an issue with trains - ive approached staff -confused and upset about how to get home - only to be met with utter disrespect and lack of concern about my situation.
.. I appreciate they have a difficult job to do - especially the guys on customer serrvices - but that is what they are paid to do !! and in my book there is NO excuse for the way I have frequently been spoken to and treated by FGW staff..
im now at home - having given up any hope of getting to work in time to do anything productive today... no replacement buses and no hope of getting my fare back plus lost wages while fgw fat cats count their xmas bonus and I get to do it all again tomorrow
Thanks for nothing fgw...
Ive now taken it as a given, I will always have at least 2 journeys where I have to stand for 40 minutes a week because they supplied a 2 carraige train and everyday its will be 50/50 if my trains arrives in the time it should. I have no idea how they work out their punctuality targets, but its either worked out incorrectly or otherwise they are fabricating it (either would not be surprising). In the past they were penalized for punctuality , yet these days they're not but the service is no doubt worse than its ever been.
On both occasions, I still got to my destination. That's a success rate of, er... 100%.
The expectation of no failed journeys and no delays at all - I.e. perfection - on such a complex network is totally unrealistic.
What you could reasonably expect more of would be working amenities of a decent, civilised quality - I.e. toilets!
Rob Kay