211 comments Add a comment
My gripe is about women who trick men into parenthood and have multiple children by different men. As these women go on their merry way producing more offspring for the state to support, do they give a thought to the feelings of anyone else? Did the man concerned want to have children with you? You may have been fine for a casual thing, but as the mother of his children, perhaps your DNA would not have been the perfect choice!
These women seem to think no further than the next benefit cheque or CSA award ...
What about the children you bring into the world? Do not they deserve to be the product of two people who love each other and who BOTH decided to bring them into the world?
These women seem to think no further than the next benefit cheque or CSA award. Their children's education goes to pot when they decide to chase the next man they want to dupe around the country. All their behaviour does is perpetuate a role model for more broken families and for their children to see this as acceptable behaviour. Isn't it time we stopped paying these women to continue the moral and social decline of our society and isn't it time to try and advocate planned pregnancies and responsible parenthood?
We need to overhaul the benefit system for young single mothers so they do not see tricking numerous men into fatherhood as a career choice. Getting pregnant to ensnare a man with money, or to keep a roof over your head is hardly a reason to bring a child into the world is it? These women are leeches who need to get of their fat back-sides and stop expecting other people to pay their way in life.
Before you trap a bloke who obviously would never pick you to bear his children, think of the quality of life the child will have coming from a broken family you selfish individual.
Leave a comment
Really... Reading this pisses me off! First, Whether a child is planned, accident, what ever it might be Life, the genetics, the characteristics, the personality, the soul of that child happens at conception! Starting with that ...right there your statements are pure stupidity. Second Ive never seen child support paid that could be considered a career move. You must be joking! Have you ever raised a child yourself? Children are expensive... My child care for 1 child is $185.00 and that is the very cheapest I could find available so I could go out and work a straight 40. You seriously think your child support you may have to pay is making these woman wealthy? Makes me want to laugh just thinking about it! My 13 year old is in piano, swim, horse back riding, orchastra, down hill skiing actually she just switched to snow board, and active member at our local church. Do you have any idea how much money I invest on a monthy to make sure she is a well raised moral active little girl? A hell of lot more than the child support ordered! You people are just ignorant as to what it takes for a single woman to raise a child. To choose life ... Is to stop having one yourself! Its a selfless act....Accepting those who abuse and neglect their children and that is a differant topic all together and easily can be proved and dealt with!
13/12/12 Inglorious Bastard
-10
This just a statement of the obvious, ALL Women Are Shallow GFE Style Prostitute Leeches Of Varying Degrees.
When is the best time to fix a mistake? As soon as possible, really the sooner the better.
This can be said if a dumb guy gets tricked into an agreement he did not want and is not in his self interest. This is true for guys in Western countries, guys thinking "its cheaper to keep her". Its not, the longer a guy stays Married the worse his financial position gets. Dump the default State Agreement as fast as possible. This is like a guy who has his arm cut off, the bleeding's bad right. You got to stop the bleeding first. You dont have to leave your wife and children. No I am just saying to do that. Change that agreement to something more stable and not guaranteed to bankrupt you.
Another thing, movies you see the characters doing physically impossible things like superman and a long list of others. Its fun to watch but we all know it 100% fantasy and NOT REAL. The same is very true about the Disneyland romance and relashenship values, all pretty-much 100% fantasy. If you follow any of this, especially if you are a guy your life will be an ongoing disaster pretty much 100% of the time.
No guy is going to be happy being cuckold, that is duped into supporting basterd children.
A guy has a better chance if he understands how the legal system is stacked against him the perverse incentives women face.
24/07/12 Joe America
When is the best time to fix a mistake? As soon as possible, really the sooner the better.
This can be said if a dumb guy gets tricked into an agreement he did not want and is not in his self interest. This is true for guys in Western countries, guys thinking "its cheaper to keep her". Its not, the longer a guy stays Married the worse his financial position gets. Dump the default State Agreement as fast as possible. This is like a guy who has his arm cut off, the bleeding's bad right. You got to stop the bleeding first. You dont have to leave your wife and children. No I am just saying to do that. Change that agreement to something more stable and not guaranteed to bankrupt you.
Another thing, movies you see the characters doing physically impossible things like superman and a long list of others. Its fun to watch but we all know it 100% fantasy and NOT REAL. The same is very true about the Disneyland romance and relashenship values, all pretty-much 100% fantasy. If you follow any of this, especially if you are a guy your life will be an ongoing disaster pretty much 100% of the time.
No guy is going to be happy being cuckold, that is duped into supporting basterd children.
A guy has a better chance if he understands how the legal system is stacked against him the perverse incentives women face.
-4
Sad but true - women actually do this...mo consideration for the life they're bringing into the world. pathetic n' selfish n' oh so wrong. But, not all women.
18/06/12 axl2012
-3
Wow florida girl. I'd venture to guess less than 10% of people viewing this page and deciding to comment on the content are not motivated by some personal story which directed them here as they googled "women who do" or "men that" etc. etc. while in the midst of some heated custody battle or grappling with personal guilt over the breakdown of their family. But I digress. What I'd really like to say is that you are wrong Florida girl, and not because you have some emotional stock to express that you're right or wrong but because the laws are not set in favor of that seemingly rare male specimen that actually loves their child(ren) and wishes to be in their lives. You can diminish their role biologically, emotionally, spiritually and so on. It's so easy to have a counter point. "Well, how is it in their favor if I'm stuck raising my kid(s) while he has all the freedom to do as he pleases?" Humdedum.
Ever come across a man who in fact would gladly take full custody of their child or have the Assumed equal parentage rights as a mother? Sure, we all have. So, how is it they're being selfish? Man- "I want my child(ren)". Woman- "No, you can't have them and you're to blame for society agreeing that it's better they're with me. You just want to run around and be a single playboy. Now give me money so I can take them from your life as much as possible, comfortably." Man- "I just said I wanted my children! And now I'm taking you to court to fight for that right!" Woman(society)- "Did you hear something? He must be just another typical man.. not wanting to man up (see-open the wallet to support injustice)"
This happened with a case where the woman cheated on the man, extorted him for money and refuses to this day to agree to a paternity test, yet protests for the "father's" support.
But then... everyone has a story Florida. Question is... is the story an honest representation or a concoction to appear a certain way?
04/03/11 Justanotherresponse
Ever come across a man who in fact would gladly take full custody of their child or have the Assumed equal parentage rights as a mother? Sure, we all have. So, how is it they're being selfish? Man- "I want my child(ren)". Woman- "No, you can't have them and you're to blame for society agreeing that it's better they're with me. You just want to run around and be a single playboy. Now give me money so I can take them from your life as much as possible, comfortably." Man- "I just said I wanted my children! And now I'm taking you to court to fight for that right!" Woman(society)- "Did you hear something? He must be just another typical man.. not wanting to man up (see-open the wallet to support injustice)"
This happened with a case where the woman cheated on the man, extorted him for money and refuses to this day to agree to a paternity test, yet protests for the "father's" support.
But then... everyone has a story Florida. Question is... is the story an honest representation or a concoction to appear a certain way?
-8
mmm holland in cheshire you know this is you. go get a full time job and get off benefits.
28/02/11 at the end
-6
Anon,
Maybe you don't need to be Einstein to work out who is causing trouble around here, but it does help if you can show where you got conclusion from. From where i'm standing you don't have the basic understanding of the math needed to give your conclusion as the true answer.
I know your conclusion is wrong because i'm not Grumps or Kathleen and they are not me.
09/12/10 nicci247
Maybe you don't need to be Einstein to work out who is causing trouble around here, but it does help if you can show where you got conclusion from. From where i'm standing you don't have the basic understanding of the math needed to give your conclusion as the true answer.
I know your conclusion is wrong because i'm not Grumps or Kathleen and they are not me.
-9
I think we can take that as a compliment then anon.Being a lowlife weekly gripe dweller isn't as bad as being a Grimsby one.
Oh Gainsborough, i've noticed another one of your split self...joe bangles...he is related to the racist Mr Bojangles u've used in the past.
08/12/10 nicci247
Oh Gainsborough, i've noticed another one of your split self...joe bangles...he is related to the racist Mr Bojangles u've used in the past.
-1
I repeat what I asked. If you cannot answer then , yet again, you have lost what it pleases you to call "credibility".
G.L, please tell me which things I have said that are evidence of any sort of low life character.
It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.
Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.
It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?
It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.
Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.
07/12/10 Anonymous but still credible
G.L, please tell me which things I have said that are evidence of any sort of low life character.
It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.
Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.
It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?
It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.
Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.
-2
nicci247 , Yes you are probably right, not worth getting upset about. Thanks for that.
07/12/10 Anonymous but still credible
1
anonymous but still credible,
It's pointless asking him that as he is in his own deluded little world. He will never answer as he has no answer.
07/12/10 nicci247
It's pointless asking him that as he is in his own deluded little world. He will never answer as he has no answer.
-6
Gainsborough,Why are you saying sorry to me? like i'd accept it from the likes of you...that would be like eating 4rsen1c from the hand of a trap baiter...and i'm not that stupid or craven for new friends. You'd be better off by not causing hatred for yourself in the first place.
07/12/10 nicci247
8
G.L, please tell me which things I have said that are evidence of any sort of low life character.
It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.
Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.
It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?
It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.
Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.
07/12/10 anonymous but still credible
It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.
Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.
It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?
It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.
Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.
8
"You are only fooling yourself, once the name calling starts you have lost the argument,"
..from the desk of GL
"your lowlife sort of posting would fit in a bit better on there!"
..also from the desk of GL, (who is an Rs licking hypocrite).
07/12/10 anon
..from the desk of GL
"your lowlife sort of posting would fit in a bit better on there!"
..also from the desk of GL, (who is an Rs licking hypocrite).
-3
Gainsborough,
I've never heard of the "Grimsby news" comments pages, but it's clearly another place you haunt...
so i'll refuse your offer if you don't mind.
You have so many names that you use that I don't think another one added would really matter or change what people already think about you. You're the biggest loser here...nobody else.
07/12/10 nicci247
I've never heard of the "Grimsby news" comments pages, but it's clearly another place you haunt...
so i'll refuse your offer if you don't mind.
You have so many names that you use that I don't think another one added would really matter or change what people already think about you. You're the biggest loser here...nobody else.
1
Inglorious bastard