42 comments Add a comment
It doesn't seem to matter how straightforward you make a process, or how foolproof you think the system you have developed is. There is always a manager out there who takes it upon themselves to throw a spanner in the works and do it their own way regardless of the guidelines you set out for them. I'm pretty sure that cleaning up after them wasn't in my job description and I do not suffer fools gladly!
I've got a pretty mundane job these days, but it is occasionally brightened up by some of the stupid things those in a position of some authority do. These so called team leaders and managers are looking after a team of people, but it would seem that they are basically incapable of following a few simple rules to get a job done. These rules are designed to make my job straightforward and reduce the chances of making mistakes with the data. When they decide to do their own thing, it gives me a whole load more work to do to sort out the mess. Why can't they just follow the procedures that I set out? It's really not that difficult!
Okay, just to clarify things a bit, I receive a number of spreadsheets each week containing basic data such as employee numbers and dates. I simply transfer this information into a database so that someone somewhere can run a report. No problem you might think. Anyway, last year the format of these spreadsheets was agreed by all parties and the managers and team members were duly sent out a copy with very specific instructions as to what was expected of them. We're talking about 3 simple columns here on one worksheet, so it's pretty hard to screw up.
To date at least a quarter of the returned sheets have to be amended in some form or other. They either put useless comments in the fields, or leave out dates all together. Sometimes they do both. I really don't care that such and such wasn't in that day and you don't know the dates. Just send me 'good data' in the format we requested or send nothing at all!
It saddens me to think that most managerial staff get paid way more than technical and administrative staff when clearly so many of them do not have any common sense and think that if they don't like the way something is done, they can change it whenever they like.
Leave a comment
They think that coz they're paid more for their frankly laughable "leadership" skills by dint of being a uni graduate, hence on a trainee manager programme that some of these companies operate(im thinking supermarkets especially) they're more intelligent than the thickos who have to put up with them as their boss.
The police force started to suffer from that type of wooly headed thinking at the top some years back also and they wonder why crime has gone up.
Neil B is a smug f***
I'm absolutely certain that you enjoy making their workshifts as miserable as possible whilst feeding your ego.
I bet you used to bully other kids in school and sucked up to the PE teacher so you could be on the 'team'. F*** Off.
I have just read the above gripe about "Stupid Managers" etc. Well of the twenty three staff I have I would say about four or five of them can work without any supervision at all. As for the rest? Well some of them are not capable of wiping their own backsides without some sort of help. Half of them cannot manage to perform the simple function of opening boxes and placing the contents on a shelf without constant supervision. Most of them are always Losing their case-cutters or gloves and moaning their heads off to have them replaced. When I cannot replace the items it"s always my fault, never theirs.
So if anyone starts off about "stupid managers" or "stupid supervisors" they should first think about two things.
1. Have they ever had the courage to take on a role of higher responsibility?
2. Can they work effectively and independently without supervision?
They used to turn out the type of drivel that you have been kind enough to share with us. It would be laughable if it weren't for the fact that people like these had the power to determine the professional development and remuneration of people who were in every way their superiors.
If this smacks of jealousy (no doubt my lovely new friend Chloe if she reads this will tell me I have 'anger management issues') then I can assure you there is no jealousy at all. I left the company with an excellent package and am now master of my own time, destiny, and income. Who's jealous now? ..... the managers and directors I left behind who are still trapped on the treadmill!
Mud Grinder, you have my sympathy, I've been there, and I hope you can get out. On the other hand you only have 3 years or so to go to retirement, I had a lot more.
You say the manager is a "remote one working in another country".
Is English his second language? The appaling drivel he writes certainly suggests this.
Jim needs to improve regarding associating and correctly
categorizing knowledge items to customer problems. My
expectation would be that at least 50% of the problems closed
with solution would have provided an associated knowledge item
attached which is categorized as ...
If there's anyone aged 62 out there who needs to "improve" please let me know. Otherwise this is the kind of claptrap I got in school reports 50 years ago.
My manager, a remote one working in another country, did not know I was a graduate.
Grumpy of the M4