70 comments Add a comment
I write this gripe with steam coming out of my ears. The courts in this country are an absolute joke and it appears to me that whatever crime the low life commit the punishment never fits. There is always some excuse put forward, "he had a bad upbringing", "he only did it to fund his habit" or "he or she was depressed at the time!"
I recently read a very disturbing article about two males who had asked an off duty police officer for a light and when he said that he didn't have one, they assaulted him and beat him so badly that he was in a coma for several weeks. Although he eventually woke up, this man is now in a permanent vegetative state and is unable to speak, feed himself, or basically do anything.
Judge thought original sentence was too harsh...
The offenders were traced, prosecuted and received a very fitting sentence (numerous years behind bars), however they appealed and guess what? They had their sentence halved by a judge as in his words "He thought that the original sentence was too harsh!" This police officer is now dependant on everyone around him for day to day care so how could the sentence be too harsh?
Another case was of a man who was beaten by two crazed men just because he was making a telephone call in the place where they wanted to take illegal substances. For his "crime" he received a broken eye socket, broken jaw and a fractured skull. Yet again they were put before the courts, but this time they were let off and given a supervision order because of the broken homes they came from and the fact that they needed help.
... judicial system cares more for the offenders
So from all this can we assume that the judicial system cares more for the offenders than it does the people affected by crime. I'm sure that if that person was a member of the judge's or magistrate's family then the sentence would be greatly increased. Why do I feel so strongly about this? I am a serving police officer and am so angry about the way the system treats people on the receiving end of crime. So much police time and effort is put into bringing the criminal to justice, just to watch them walk away laughing.
By: Wizard69
Leave a comment
I'm sorry I don't understand - Open the prision (sic) doors to a cat?
The officers will face gross misconduct charges but not criminal charges
Mr Ullah, 39, died after police forced him to the ground in High Wycombe
Officers alleged that he had drugs in his mouth before he collapsed
An inquest into his death was abandoned in 2011 after discrepancies emerged in police statements
The IPCC confirms that police officers could be sacked !!!!!
SICK AND TIRED OF THESE PIGS , MORE ACTION TO BE TAKEN AGAINST THESE CRIMINALS AND OPEN THE PRISION DOOR TO A CAT !
Honestly when will it stop , will we ever be safe ?
PCSO Alexis Scott took money as passengers prepared to board at Gatwick
The 39-year-old told them they were only allowed to take £1,000 out of UK
Those who argued told they could be detained, prosecutor claims
She even held her police hat out for victims to put money in, court hears
In total she conned £10,000 from six travellers in April last year, jury told
She has been convicted of six counts of theft and abusing her position
LOL , AS IVE ALWAYS SAID A BUNCH ON CRIMINALS IN UNIFORM !I HOPE SHE GOES TO JAIL !
I wonder what these guys are thinking - judges need to come down hard on the cops and their corruption !
That’s why you hate the police then, you keep losing cases and blaming others for your own intellectual deficiencies.
Jokers
What a joke !
These criminals also get paid for their malicious behaviour .
And the judges - another bunch of twits
Lets start there !
Oh and every police should wear a camera & have it reviewed by the court to insure he was acting honestly ... Lots of things go missing on raids !
We all know the police can't be trusted & the CPS another bunch of wasters !!!
Role out body cameras & issue the sack to any officer that over steps his post or lies !
And the CPS well we should have them put under a microscope !
Corruption to the core & the judge and jurors are aware !
That could never work. What would the jury's verdict be? Guilty, not guilty or ... well, we think he did it but we could be wrong.
If there is reasonable doubt they are supposed to find them innocent. Any hint that there was doubt would mean lawyers immediately requesting a new trial.
Jethro.
It's not just the EU judges, it's the UK judges and legal system as well that think they are unanswerable and a law unto themselves. These faceless entities will do anything to rule and dictate on their own terms. It's time this system was brought to heel.