|
I had basic sky installed about 4 years ago but cancelled at the end of the year as there was nothing I wanted to watch which I couldn't see on freeview. I kept the satellite, wiring and digibox.
Last December I decided to buy my family HD TV and a friend recommended the Sky HD+, particularly for the functionality of the time slip hard drive. I paid £129 for the installation of the new service and agreed to a monthly fee of £36, of which £9.95 was the monthly fee for HD+. I regarded this as an absurd amount of money but wanted to give my family a nice treat.
The engineer who came simply connected the HD+ box to the existing sky connection and left. We recently extended our house and went to the expense of putting in a conduit through which to run cables. The satellite dish is on wall of a ground floor courtyard. All you need is rod, like a fishing rod to push the cable through.
Our Sky HD+ has never worked properly and I haven't been able to record anything in the 5 months I have owned the system! The few programmes shown in HD are good quality, but certainly not worth paying £120 per year for. The sky signal for the basic service is also very unreliable and goes down at least 3 times a month - usually when I want to watch a horse race or other time sensitive event. At present Sky is less reliable than "freeview".
If you need to watch a film you can either rent or download from the Internet. The customer service is non existent. The "support" phone number shown on the screen had been incorrect for 6 months. The automated menu system is excruciating and the good people of Bangalore, India find it hard to communicate with us (not their fault). You then get Livingstone, where some people can be very helpful, but are powerless to actually solve the problem.
|