Loading
 

Women who trick men into parenthood

My gripe is about women who trick men into parenthood and have multiple children by different men.  As these women go on their merry way producing more offspring for the state to support, do they give a thought to the feelings of anyone else?  Did the man concerned want to have children with you?  You may have been fine for a casual thing, but as the mother of his children, perhaps your DNA would not have been the perfect choice!

A pregnant woman

What about the children you bring into the world?  Do not they deserve to be the product of two people who love each other and who BOTH decided to bring them into the world?

These women seem to think no further than the next benefit cheque or CSA award.  Their children's education goes to pot when they decide to chase the next man they want to dupe around the country.  All their behaviour does is perpetuate a role model for more broken families and for their children to see this as acceptable behaviour.  Isn't it time we stopped paying these women to continue the moral and social decline of our society and isn't it time to try and advocate planned pregnancies and responsible parenthood?

We need to overhaul the benefit system for young single mothers so they do not see tricking numerous men into fatherhood as a career choice.  Getting pregnant to ensnare a man with money, or to keep a roof over your head is hardly a reason to bring a child into the world is it?  These women are leeches who need to get of their fat back-sides and stop expecting other people to pay their way in life.

Before you trap a bloke who obviously would never pick you to bear his children, think of the quality of life the child will have coming from a broken family you selfish individual.

Share on Google Plus

Comments from visitors

Post a comment

Enter your comments in the space below.

Name or nickname


Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11
Sort:

Wow florida girl. I'd venture to guess less than 10% of people viewing this page and deciding to comment on the content are not motivated by some personal story which directed them here as they googled "women who do" or "men that" etc. etc. while in the midst of some heated custody battle or grappling with personal guilt over the breakdown of their family. But I digress. What I'd really like to say is that you are wrong Florida girl, and not because you have some emotional stock to express that you're right or wrong but because the laws are not set in favor of that seemingly rare male specimen that actually loves their child(ren) and wishes to be in their lives. You can diminish their role biologically, emotionally, spiritually and so on. It's so easy to have a counter point. "Well, how is it in their favor if I'm stuck raising my kid(s) while he has all the freedom to do as he pleases?" Humdedum.

Ever come across a man who in fact would gladly take full custody of their child or have the Assumed equal parentage rights as a mother? Sure, we all have. So, how is it they're being selfish? Man- "I want my child(ren)". Woman- "No, you can't have them and you're to blame for society agreeing that it's better they're with me. You just want to run around and be a single playboy. Now give me money so I can take them from your life as much as possible, comfortably." Man- "I just said I wanted my children! And now I'm taking you to court to fight for that right!" Woman(society)- "Did you hear something? He must be just another typical man.. not wanting to man up (see-open the wallet to support injustice)"

This happened with a case where the woman cheated on the man, extorted him for money and refuses to this day to agree to a paternity test, yet protests for the "father's" support.

But then... everyone has a story Florida. Question is... is the story an honest representation or a concoction to appear a certain way?

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Justanotherresponse - 4-Mar-11 05:23 

mmm holland in cheshire you know this is you. go get a full time job and get off benefits.

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

at the end - 28-Feb-11 00:03 

Anon,
Maybe you don't need to be Einstein to work out who is causing trouble around here, but it does help if you can show where you got conclusion from. From where i'm standing you don't have the basic understanding of the math needed to give your conclusion as the true answer.
I know your conclusion is wrong because i'm not Grumps or Kathleen and they are not me.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 9-Dec-10 13:02 

I think we can take that as a compliment then anon.Being a lowlife weekly gripe dweller isn't as bad as being a Grimsby one.
Oh Gainsborough, i've noticed another one of your split self...joe bangles...he is related to the racist Mr Bojangles u've used in the past.

-4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 8-Dec-10 00:12 

I repeat what I asked. If you cannot answer then , yet again, you have lost what it pleases you to call "credibility".

G.L, please tell me which things I have said that are evidence of any sort of low life character.

It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.

Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.

It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?

It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.

Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Anonymous but still credible - 7-Dec-10 23:06 

nicci247 , Yes you are probably right, not worth getting upset about. Thanks for that.

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Anonymous but still credible - 7-Dec-10 17:16 

anonymous but still credible,
It's pointless asking him that as he is in his own deluded little world. He will never answer as he has no answer.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 7-Dec-10 17:00 

Gainsborough,Why are you saying sorry to me? like i'd accept it from the likes of you...that would be like eating 4rsen1c from the hand of a trap baiter...and i'm not that stupid or craven for new friends. You'd be better off by not causing hatred for yourself in the first place.

+3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 7-Dec-10 16:55 

G.L, please tell me which things I have said that are evidence of any sort of low life character.

It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.

Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.

It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?

It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.

Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.

+7

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

anonymous but still credible - 7-Dec-10 15:28 

"You are only fooling yourself, once the name calling starts you have lost the argument,"

..from the desk of GL

"your lowlife sort of posting would fit in a bit better on there!"

..also from the desk of GL, (who is an Rs licking hypocrite).

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

anon - 7-Dec-10 12:06 

Gainsborough,
I've never heard of the "Grimsby news" comments pages, but it's clearly another place you haunt...
so i'll refuse your offer if you don't mind.
You have so many names that you use that I don't think another one added would really matter or change what people already think about you. You're the biggest loser here...nobody else.

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 7-Dec-10 00:12 

Thankyou anonymous but still credible.
He has used that sentence so many times i've lost count... all you have to do is search his name at the top of the comments page.It's all there.
Why he is picking on grumps I don't know as she's always stuck up for him in the past. Maybe he has burnt his bridge with her also, after all...she is female.It was only a matter of time.
He has been making crass comments about female posters and women as far back as I can remember, and that is roughly three years now since my first post.
Maybe one day he will learn the true meaning of Karma.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 7-Dec-10 00:03 

GL claimed last night that he was not "feminist spotter" whom you were talking to but he used exactly the same phrase "once the name calling starts you have lost the argument" that "feminist spotter" did before his posts were deleted. He thought no one would notice or remember.

He has lied before about not using other names and been caught out.

It seems likely then that he is in fact "feminist spotter" and that means he was talking to himself - which he has done before as well - and was also the person making nasty comments about grumpyoldwoman.

He has made nasty claims about quite a few female posters recently. I think he is losing it a bit.

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

anonymous but still credible - 6-Dec-10 22:47 

Gainsborough,
I couldn't really give a toss what you think about how name calling lowers a person's argument straight to defeat.I'll do it all the same and feel no way.
Maybe you would like to let us all know how you work out that name calling has been aimed at you? How would you know that any name calling has gone on if you weren't about to read it before admin deleted the posts ?
Clearly you're acting like you weren't posting last night, but we both know you were. you've gone up five posts since I was last on, but there seems to be no trace of them apart from the one below...are you going to plead ignorant ?

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 6-Dec-10 22:26 

Gainsborough/Frankie Howard , why don't you go get on with your so perfect life and your new wife instead of sh1t stirring and watching others ? You must be jealous.
It seems to me that you have no life, no wife and as far as your social circle goes...well you're just a billy no-mates, a social mis-fit that feels hard-done-by by the world and seeks revenge on who ever dis-agrees with what you have to say.
Use your own user name in future G.L.
As some may of noticed the posts that weren't made by me have been removed.
Thankyou Kenny.x

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

nicci247 - 5-Dec-10 20:07 

I notice that Gainsborough Lad , who has been proven to have used a string of different nicknames, can get away with accusing regular contributors - and what a surprise that his victims are always women - of doing exactly what he does himself. It is not surprising that some people dislike him for this so what can he expect?

However I don't see that anyone is stalking him, just disagreeing which they are entitled to do.


Meantime the people who are posting anonymously or who also use a different name every day, are chuckling away to themselves that they have set the cat among the pigeons and that regular posters keep falling for it and have started to squabble amongst themselves.

I have said it before but I think this site would be better for having log in with email address. I have been accused of things I didn't do and, while it is hardly that big a deal, it is unpleasant.

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Kathleen W - 5-Dec-10 15:35 

feminist spotter; you need to have your head examined.

I won't go into all the ways you're wrong or offer up evidence, as you are obviously a troublemaker and not worth any more of my time.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 4-Dec-10 14:55 

Stalk a bnp supporting mysogenist??? Jeez no I would rather stick glass in my eyes or have lunch with nick fell!

Sensible people on here know you for what you are - an over opinionated bafoon! And im being kind with that description

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

biddy - 3-Dec-10 14:46 

ahhh seems that gainsbrough lad is back posting in the guise of anon-anon-anon again

Sad spiteful old GL whose wife upped & got off with a better model!

You need to get help with the issues you have with women you know - its really not healthy!

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

biddy - 2-Dec-10 21:45 

My advice to all men, if you keep it in your trousers then you can`t screwed, to be screwed once you are dumb,to be screwed twice you are dumber.

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

monk - 2-Dec-10 20:27 

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11
Sort:

Close

Enter email to receive updates:RSS Feed

Twitter