Women who trick men into parenthood
|
My gripe is about women who trick men into parenthood and have multiple children by different men. As these women go on their merry way producing more offspring for the state to support, do they give a thought to the feelings of anyone else? Did the man concerned want to have children with you? You may have been fine for a casual thing, but as the mother of his children, perhaps your DNA would not have been the perfect choice! |
|
|
What about the children you bring into the world? Do not they deserve to be the product of two people who love each other and who BOTH decided to bring them into the world? These women seem to think no further than the next benefit cheque or CSA award. Their children's education goes to pot when they decide to chase the next man they want to dupe around the country. All their behaviour does is perpetuate a role model for more broken families and for their children to see this as acceptable behaviour. Isn't it time we stopped paying these women to continue the moral and social decline of our society and isn't it time to try and advocate planned pregnancies and responsible parenthood? |
|
We need to overhaul the benefit system for young single mothers so they do not see tricking numerous men into fatherhood as a career choice. Getting pregnant to ensnare a man with money, or to keep a roof over your head is hardly a reason to bring a child into the world is it? These women are leeches who need to get of their fat back-sides and stop expecting other people to pay their way in life. Before you trap a bloke who obviously would never pick you to bear his children, think of the quality of life the child will have coming from a broken family you selfish individual. |
Comments from visitors
Ever come across a man who in fact would gladly take full custody of their child or have the Assumed equal parentage rights as a mother? Sure, we all have. So, how is it they're being selfish? Man- "I want my child(ren)". Woman- "No, you can't have them and you're to blame for society agreeing that it's better they're with me. You just want to run around and be a single playboy. Now give me money so I can take them from your life as much as possible, comfortably." Man- "I just said I wanted my children! And now I'm taking you to court to fight for that right!" Woman(society)- "Did you hear something? He must be just another typical man.. not wanting to man up (see-open the wallet to support injustice)"
This happened with a case where the woman cheated on the man, extorted him for money and refuses to this day to agree to a paternity test, yet protests for the "father's" support.
But then... everyone has a story Florida. Question is... is the story an honest representation or a concoction to appear a certain way?
Justanotherresponse - 4-Mar-11 05:23
Maybe you don't need to be Einstein to work out who is causing trouble around here, but it does help if you can show where you got conclusion from. From where i'm standing you don't have the basic understanding of the math needed to give your conclusion as the true answer.
I know your conclusion is wrong because i'm not Grumps or Kathleen and they are not me.
Oh Gainsborough, i've noticed another one of your split self...joe bangles...he is related to the racist Mr Bojangles u've used in the past.
G.L, please tell me which things I have said that are evidence of any sort of low life character.
It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.
Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.
It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?
It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.
Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.
Anonymous but still credible - 7-Dec-10 23:06
Anonymous but still credible - 7-Dec-10 17:16
It's pointless asking him that as he is in his own deluded little world. He will never answer as he has no answer.
It is true that you are the only person to have been proved to have used multiple names. I don't think you realise that no one cares that you do - it is only because you abuse other posters when you think they do it that annoys people because it is hypocritical. If you didn't do that no one would care.
Please quote the "name calling". I only made the one post and there was no name calling.
It is also true that you used the same phrases that "feminist spotter" did. I may have made the wrong assumption but it looks rather odd doesn't it?
It is also true that you have made accusations about female posters and led Nick Fell to believe that the person posting anonymously was a woman when there was no reason to believe that.
Nothing I said was untrue or insulting so what is your problem? I called you no names at all but you called me a low life for saying something already suggested by others, and with good reason based on your track record.
anonymous but still credible - 7-Dec-10 15:28
..from the desk of GL
"your lowlife sort of posting would fit in a bit better on there!"
..also from the desk of GL, (who is an Rs licking hypocrite).
I've never heard of the "Grimsby news" comments pages, but it's clearly another place you haunt...
so i'll refuse your offer if you don't mind.
You have so many names that you use that I don't think another one added would really matter or change what people already think about you. You're the biggest loser here...nobody else.
He has used that sentence so many times i've lost count... all you have to do is search his name at the top of the comments page.It's all there.
Why he is picking on grumps I don't know as she's always stuck up for him in the past. Maybe he has burnt his bridge with her also, after all...she is female.It was only a matter of time.
He has been making crass comments about female posters and women as far back as I can remember, and that is roughly three years now since my first post.
Maybe one day he will learn the true meaning of Karma.
He has lied before about not using other names and been caught out.
It seems likely then that he is in fact "feminist spotter" and that means he was talking to himself - which he has done before as well - and was also the person making nasty comments about grumpyoldwoman.
He has made nasty claims about quite a few female posters recently. I think he is losing it a bit.
anonymous but still credible - 6-Dec-10 22:47
I couldn't really give a toss what you think about how name calling lowers a person's argument straight to defeat.I'll do it all the same and feel no way.
Maybe you would like to let us all know how you work out that name calling has been aimed at you? How would you know that any name calling has gone on if you weren't about to read it before admin deleted the posts ?
Clearly you're acting like you weren't posting last night, but we both know you were. you've gone up five posts since I was last on, but there seems to be no trace of them apart from the one below...are you going to plead ignorant ?
It seems to me that you have no life, no wife and as far as your social circle goes...well you're just a billy no-mates, a social mis-fit that feels hard-done-by by the world and seeks revenge on who ever dis-agrees with what you have to say.
Use your own user name in future G.L.
As some may of noticed the posts that weren't made by me have been removed.
Thankyou Kenny.x
However I don't see that anyone is stalking him, just disagreeing which they are entitled to do.
Meantime the people who are posting anonymously or who also use a different name every day, are chuckling away to themselves that they have set the cat among the pigeons and that regular posters keep falling for it and have started to squabble amongst themselves.
I have said it before but I think this site would be better for having log in with email address. I have been accused of things I didn't do and, while it is hardly that big a deal, it is unpleasant.
I won't go into all the ways you're wrong or offer up evidence, as you are obviously a troublemaker and not worth any more of my time.
grumpyoldwoman - 4-Dec-10 14:55
Sensible people on here know you for what you are - an over opinionated bafoon! And im being kind with that description
Sad spiteful old GL whose wife upped & got off with a better model!
You need to get help with the issues you have with women you know - its really not healthy!





