Ex-husband buys daughter's love

Solicitor or not, he made some new points that had not been touched or mentioned before on this type of gripe,

At first I didn't doubt that he was a solicitor, but after reading all your posts, I now have a little doubt, he mixed there up with their on one of the last lines, but even a solicitor could do this.

ES - not sure what you want me to clarify? I was making an observation. You have very little knowledge of the situation. Careful not to get your fact and fantasy confused - not good news for a solicitor!

In spite of the arguments over who is, and who is not legally qualified, the OP's divorce / custody arrangements are subject to Montana State Law not English Law or so it seems.

Unless there is a member of that upstanding and august body, the State Bar of Montana contributing to Blog.co.UK, it seems to me that it would be more useful for participants to offer practical suggestions on how to deal with the practical and emotional problems instead of bragging about supposed legal qualifications.

Having said that, I believe that transporting a minor across State lines against restrictions imposed by a State Court is also a Federal offence, however I would happily defer to a US Attorney's Opinion on this

Mike / Jane your diversionary tactic/s is clearly not standing up? I have no reason whatsoever to come here and lie some of us have a very good moral compass and are not morally retarded.
Also your actions are very indicative of the great unwashed what you are clearly part of, I can tell you now that you would be the perfect respondent witness
( FOR ME TO CROSS EXAMINE THAT IS )
your mouth is clearly 15 seconds in front of your clearly sluggish "brain"

There you see MikeP, you idiotic buffoon, I told you solicitors are not meant to be understood either verbally or in written context! I mean, who would pay three thousand pounds a go for somebody who could speak plain english!

The English Solicitor :

From your original posting, just this sums you up for a blustering uneducated idiot.
"as for I whom works the Family Law courts 7 days a week 52 weeks a year, "

The 'secretary' line doesn't work, solicitors are supposed to be educated people. You clearly are not. I doubt if you even have a profession.

Mike it is very clear that you are a FEMALE masquerading as a MALE, nonetheless could you please elaborate on how you reach the conclusion that "I"
( WHO WORKS THE FAMILY LAW COURTS 5 DAYS A WEEK AND HAS DONE SO FOR OVER 10 YEARS ) am a disgrace to my profession?
also as a solicitor I write nothing I have a Secretary for this? were you not fully conversant with this very simple fact? I can educate you also to the QUITE OBVIOUS fact that all Solicitor's, and Barrister's have what is called a " Dictation Machine " and a Secretary to write the transcript from any dictation? so I think you must have even below a mediocre level of intelligence as you have just made two ( SCHOOL BOY ERRORS ) as we say, furthermore my rhetoric is based on my professional opinion? what is your PROFESSIONAL OPINION? as I am assuming you are qualified such as I to hold a PROFESSIONAL OPINION? now you can chose to take a calculated risk and give the impression that you are a professional? and I will then ask entry level Family Law criteria ( for your benefit ) that Google will have no answer for.

SO YOU SHOULD REALLY GET YOUR OWN HOUSE IN ORDER.... JANE.................I MEAN MIKE.

ooooohhhhhh!!!!!!!! she"s off on one ! poor old mike! a tampax, quickly somebody!

oldgrumpywoman (how original!)

"Firstly ES has made only one error" - that you can spot. You are equally poorly educated if that is your opinion. Apart from the poor use of English, he has written nonsense, non-sequiturs, and untruths. If the person who wrote this is a solicitor then I'm a spaceman.

"and secondly a real solicitor is not meant to be understood either verbally or in writen form."
What rot. Dont judge everyone by your own low standards of intelligence.

MikeP, yet again you have made an idiot of yourself,
Firstly ES has made only one error and secondly a real solicitor is not meant to be understood either verbally or in writen form.

The English Solicitor

If you are, as you claim, a solicitor, you are a disgrace to your profession, and with your level of written English, you have no right whatsoever to ask of someone else: "Jane, do you have even a mediocre understanding of the English language?".

Set your own house in order before you criticise others.

Jane, do you have even a mediocre understanding of the English language? could you elaborate on your wording? as for I whom works the Family Law courts 7 days a week 52 weeks a year, and almost all Magistrates, Circuit and District judges have the very same opinion, the very high majority of women going through the courts use there children as a weapon against the father, sorry to inform you of this but this is sadly very much a fact to anyone who is privy to the aforementioned circumstances on a repetitive basis, are you a Family Law solicitor also? and my facts are categorically self explanatory are they not? surely you can see this Jane? OK let me hopefully educate you again
( I HAVE WORKED IN THE FAMILY LAW COURTS REPRESENTING BOTH MALE AND FEMALE OF THE SPECIES FOR OVER 10 YEARS )

do you think this is factual enough Jane? I am not really sure of your clearly flawed point Jane?