Comic Relief, is it just a rip off?
17-May-2008
*
* Your Gripe Gripe List Quick Gripe Comments Gripe Poll About Us Site Map Resources Home *
*   *
 

Comic Relief, is it just a rip off?

Bookmarking, Google, Yahoo, MSN, Digg, Delicious, Redit, Furl and many more Add To Any >> 
Feedburner Subscribe to feed >> 
Other Related Gripes >> 
Email To A Friend >> 

 
 

First of all, let me say that I’m not a “bah humbug” kind of guy and would like to think that I am just as charitable (if not more so) than the next guy.  I always buy into all the Comic Relief and Children in need stuff as it’s just been the normal thing to do ever since I was a child.  I would guess that the same is true for a lot of people out there.

But when I look around and even do some research on the Internet, I still see lots of the kind of things we have been paying to put a stop to for about the last 20 years now.  And not only that, I have never seen one thing to suggest that the money is really being spent in the way we are told.

A clown face, red nose day, Comic Relief

So where are all these kids that we have allegedly helped?  In Africa?  Although it is conveniently very far away I don't think for one minute that tiny bore hole in the ground costs 10 million a year to maintain!  I see all this money being collected but have no idea where it is actually being spent, because it certainly isn’t anywhere near me.  If I could just see a bit more evidence of the good being done then perhaps I would not be so suspicious.

Comic Relief... So where is the other 30p going to?

Now there’s another thing that makes me feel a bit uneasy about this situation.  The television and radio companies (BBC radio is the worst) charge you £1 if you send a text to them, with 70p of this money going to Comic Relief.  Err… excuse me, so where is the other 30p going to?

I'm pretty good at arithmetic (taps away on the calculator) and I reckon that 30% of all the money from these texts must add up quite a pretty penny.  Why should we be asked to give generously when there are companies out there using these events to make a hefty profit? Surely they can do it at a reduced rate for Comic Relief?  Why can't a larger portion or even better all of the money go to the people who REALLY need it?  Oh no, of course not because it’s not the big companies that stick their hands in their pockets; that’s a job for us - the “paying” public.

I really do think that by simply doing the easy thing and giving to Comic Relief just to ease your conscience is actually taking money away from the real charities that could use our help.  Does anyone else agree?

By: Jimmy Wyld


Other Related Gripes

Are we really being ripped off?
So many problems still to solve
Christmas is just a spend fest
People are nothing but sheep
No more Chris Evans radio show
Celebrities that endorse charities
Cash for honours scandal
Adverts on television and radio
Issues with the media
Charity skydive but who pays?
Reality TV shows aren't real life
Charity muggers are irritating




Sponsored Links


Visitor Comments

Please read this before you post

Enter your comments in the space below

Name or nickname


Remember my name



 
I remember many many years ago trying to get help from children in need for a little funding to help to get a youth club up & running for the young people in the town that I used to live in. Alas to no avail. I also remember being told by some one that there was so much money left at the end of the year that a lot of it got spent doing out offices, with office equipment eg computers furnishings etc that no one really needed. How true is that. ? There just seemed to be so much I couldn't make sense of. May be things have changed today.

I think it goes for most charities today every now & again it would be good to have a break down of all monies & how they are spent.
*Boring old fart  01-Dec-2007 22:22

 
I think you are simply stupid. Our faith teaches us to alwayz help pur neighour, in any way possible, and what easier way than to give a pound or to out of the £340 average you make a week? And whoever left the comment about 'digusting human beings??' SHAME ON YOU>
*sicktotheteeth  30-Sep-2007 21:20

 
why dont cr have open accounts for the public to see as its the publics money ?
*lol  14-Jul-2007 01:35

 
Comic Relief and Children in Need are a waste of charity space. Why not concentrate on the more important beings in this world: animals! I hate that animal charities barely get a mention, yet we are encouraged to give money to digusting human beings.
*I hate you  08-May-2007 08:09

 
Jimmy,

I do agree with your point in principle. Of course, giving direct is the best way as you know every penny is going where you want it to. My point really is that many people are unable to do so and therefore £1 to comic relief is better than giving nothing at all. I think we have to accept that there are very real costs involved with organising something on the scale of CR and an amount to cover those costs will always be deducted.
I've seen CR in action in Africa and they really do do good work. They are a charity worth supporting!
*Living on easy street  02-Apr-2007 09:40

 
to living on easy street>>>>>>

I'm sorry that you cannot understand that you are in essence agreeing with the point I am making.

of COURSE giving DIRECTLY to charity, is much much more fullfilling, and I believe better than giving instead to a big corperate company, where you you have no idea if the money is being spent on food for poor, or champagne for shareholders.

I NEVER see any money spent on any good causes (except those on TV) I mean does anyone really? all around me I see poverty and depravation but where does all this money go???All our charitable notions are sucked up by this 1 yearly campagn. the effect that this has on truely needy charities, is incalcuable.
*Jimmy Wyld  01-Apr-2007 12:38

 
My school does comic relief I think your right, all the money should go to comic relief people are just to greedy to give. A man came up to me this morning and ask me for 50p to get on the bus to get home. I said no sorry I don't have any money, knowing full well I had a 50p to spare. I felt so ashamed.
*chad  16-Mar-2007 10:57

 
As I said in my earlier post, I shall give to CR as I always do. I also think that if you can give direct then that is much better. When I was in Africa I befreinded a Head Teacher at a nursery school. I got to know him very well and upon leaving I gave him £100 toward the costs of running the school. I wasn't prepared for his reaction. He cried and said he would be forever grateful for my help. This set me off too , but it proved to be the most rewarding experience of my life. He went on to tell me about how there was no government funding for schools and that his school, that he set up himself, was run entirely on charitable donations. All this was revealed AFTER I gave him the money. To me this was a true sign of his integrity.
Since being home I have raised as much as I can for the 'Kotakalu Nursery School' through boot fairs etc. Doing something to help has given me so much. I regularly receive letters from the children at the school and when I last visited I was treated like royalty on my arrival (although this was highly embarrassing for me). Giving direct is a chance that not many people get. I am not a wealthy person but I feel like the richest person alive when I look at the photos and read the letters.
I would urge everybody to give a little and trust that money does get through, or better still, go to Africa and form a bond with somebody so you can give direct. The main point being, these people don't ask to be born where they are, they don't ask their governments to neglect them, they do deserve and need our help. Think about that for a few minutes. THEN GIVE
*Living on easy street  12-Mar-2007 16:43

 
I spent some time online trying to find financial data on comic relief and could not. Like most charities / fundraisers they are not forthcoming with where the money goes and how. I am always slightly suspicious of the big high-profile charity fund-raisers because this type of adverstising is so expensive. I suppose on balance it is a good thing because it prompts some people to give who would not otherwise but for the more savy donors I'm sure there are more efficient ways of donating and with more accountability and transparency.
*trillian  12-Mar-2007 11:51

 
I do not normally give to Comic Relief, but this year a mates son is doing a sponsored silence for the cause so I am donating a few quid through him.
I do give readily to some charities that are ( or seem to be ) volunteer driven; or have helped someone close to me. The Lifeboats and Salvation Army are two of these.
I am not blind to the fact that charities do incur costs but I tend to shy away from those that run nightly TV campaigns and full page spreads in newspapers.
*SteveK  09-Mar-2007 09:27

 
Go to Africa and you will see the good work that comic relief is doing. I'm nobody special, just your average Joe really, but what I've seen there is incredible. Go there and I guarantee it will change your life. It did mine. I think it is fashionable to bash charities like this and everybody is jumping on the bandwagon to do so.
No matter what your business there are unavoidable costs. That is where some of the money goes. If the charity does not pay the cost then it cannot function at all and nobody gets any help, let alone 70% of your donation.
Join in and send in your donation on the night. I know I will!
*Living on Easy Street  07-Mar-2007 10:31

 
You can be certain, somebody is getting a BIG wallet out of this charity. I say charity should be run by VOLUNTEERS, not GREEDY Bast**ds.
*edd  07-Mar-2007 08:26


View more comments on this gripe


 
*   *
* © 2000-2008 The Weekly Gripe. All rights reserved. Please see our privacy policy and disclaimer. *