The Weekly Gripe

Gripes the News
The Soapbox
Gripes in the pipes
*

Getting a BT landline reconnected, issues faced

12 comments  Add a comment

We moved last year to a house that had previously been used as an office, so there were numerous phone and Internet sockets throughout the house, several of which were external.  I rang BT in September 2008 and asked for a phone line to be reconnected.  I was told that no line existed at my address and I would have to pay the full fee for a new line, £150 at the time, as opposed to the £25 reconnection fee.

Despite some doubt over this I agreed and set up a monthly direct debit.  I also enquired about broadband and was told it wasn't available in my area.  I set up an appointment for an engineer to attend and install the new line the following week.

The appointment came and went with no sign of an engineer and no call to say he wouldn't make it.  My partner who is self employed lost a days work waiting for him.  I had two further appointments for both of which nobody turned up and had also debited my account for £270 for installing a line and calls!  Although how we made them on a phone that didn't work I don't know!

BT landline at a house I was told a line couldn't be connected as they'd run out of space at my local exchange

I was told a line couldn't be connected as they'd run out of space at my local exchange When I complained I was told a line couldn't be connected as they'd run out of space at my local exchange and would get my money back.  I was just glad I got my money back, so cancelled the account and gave up on it just before Christmas 2008.

In January 2009 my partner decided to have another go.  He was told there was an existing line which just had to be reconnected (now £30 fee) and broadband was available.  When we received our phone number it didn't even have the correct area code, they have given us a new one.  But despite almost weekly calls to say our phone still isn't working, nothing has been done.  Both my partner and I have been left on hold for hours and eventually cut off because they cannot come up with a solution.

So far it has cost us a fortune in mobile phone charges and we have decided to give up trying, especially as there is nowhere else we can go to get a landline installed or reconnected.  It's really unfair that BT can treat us like this and they have no competition that we can turn to!


Leave a comment

Moneysaver

Moneysaver

New line install for £70 with Money Saver Telecom, entirely UK based customer services, no price increase guarantee for life, 21% cheaper than BT for rental , 31% cheaper on calls, £10.75 per month for free UK calls, line rental and VAT! 01925 401 700 (avoid the 0844 charge!)
02/02/11 Moneysaver
-54
Stone Age BT

Stone Age BT

BT are useless. BT have no idea how to run and manage an ansaphone service. They should be offering for free the facility of being able to listen to your voice message calls over the internet. They used to do this but then they blocked it. I call that retrogressive. BT are retrogressive.

They should be picking up our unanswered recording the voice mail and then sending the voicemail message as an MP3 to a nominated mailbox via email. Braindead BT don't do this.
27/12/10 Stone Age BT
-9
Oscar

Oscar

Moved house 23d July 2010 advised BT to cancel our account. Adviser said since you are an existing customer I am empowered to offer you a reconnection fee of 50 pounds instead of 127.99. I said Ok. Details came through post saying that it would be 127.99. I contacted BT again and was told that there was no mechanism to offer 50pounds connection fee but he would put a remark in the computer that I was unhappy and that I would be claiming in writing for a refund of the difference. I said no and that I wanted all contracts with BT cancelled. I was given an order number and told to phone back the next day as it takes 24 hours to activated the order. I did this and the cancellation confirmed. I have the name and order number. Having been in our new home for 10 days I had a bad feeling that our old number was still active. So today the 4th August I phoned BT yet again. Eventually got through and was told that the line was indeed still live. " I will put you through to another section " said BT rep. Got through, (got his name) told him the story and was told " I can't help you I will put you through to another section". Surprise surprise I got cut off. So at present my old number is being used by someone else & bill will be building up. If BT think I am going to pay a cancellation charge they can think again. I will see them on watchdog.
03/12/10 Oscar
-14
Frank0770

Frank0770

Same old same old,bt have the monopoly,so much for a democratic society,monopolies board,where are they sitting,in the equation,below bt ?.
12/11/10 Frank0770
-14
wasim

wasim

hi I am wasim and I might help you get a new line install at your premises with BB.if you are interested do mail me at my email id wasim4u007@gmail.com
05/03/10 wasim
5
Mr P Burke

Mr P Burke

I first got a phone line connection of BT in November 2008, I was charged £188, when there was already a line already in the property. Since then AOL have give me a nightmare, with a broadband account. They charge me £22.49 a month, for a laptop and broadband, and I am tie in to an account until December 2010. It is a nightmare
26/11/09 Mr P Burke
-8
EJA

EJA

I had virtually exactly the same when I moved house - I knew there was an old line that had just been disconnected (even had the old number), but BT swore black and blue I would need a new line and they would charge me £150. It took us three months, several letters to a named manager of complaints and the chairmans office until we eventually got service (reconnected)

My advice - hold firm if you're confident there was an old BT line in there, don't let any sarcastic or condescending salesperson try and tell you (and get you to pay)otherwise, try and find the old number from the previous occupant, don't call 150 and write directly to the chairmans office (politely) demanding service - last time I looked they still had to provide service to all households as part of their operating contract
06/08/09 EJA
-10
JMA

JMA

BT need to get their act together. If this is kind of thing we can expect getting a landline connected just imagine what it's like when you want to cancel and go with a different provider.
03/08/09 JMA
-3
Anon

Anon

T 1571 what a con. Not only is its storage capacity of 10 calls feeble when filled up with unwanted spam calls. Not only is it feeble as it is so slow to operate. Now they have removed the access via the internet service, and we have no proper way of accessing our calls remotely and simply.

Like everything to do with BT I wish their monopoly of the local link was destroyed completely and utterly.

Come back to BT? No way Jose.
16/06/09 Anon
-9
Swindonian

Swindonian

This doesn't surprise me at all. We live in a massive new estate in North Swindon (Wiltshire) and BT ran out of lines faster than the houses were being built. Hundreds were left with a brand new house and no phone line. So they eventually realised they needed to build a new exchange and promptly named it with the wrong area (Haydon Wick instead of Haydon End, the former of which is a couple of miles away). Then they migrated the existing lines from the old exchange to the new which meant THOUSANDS of people lost their lines for anything from a couple of hours (acceptable) to over a week (unacceptable).

If you want some depressing reading, try http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/btsupplier/3201865-haydon-wick-migration-part-3.html?page=15&view=collapsed - part 3 of a long saga, this part has nearly 300 posts alone! This forum could be of use to you anyway.

Don't forget that BT Broadband, BT Wholesale, and BT OpenReach are independent companies and they do NOT talk to each other. Perhaps their phones don't work?

Oh, and I can't get anything other than BT Broadband because BT OpenReach's information says I'm still connected to the old exchange and that that exchange doesn't have LLU for BeBroadband (which is true, but the new exchange does - and that's the one I am connected to).

Surprisingly, emailing cceo@bt.com usually results in a human response, normally of British origin.
28/05/09 Swindonian
-4
Freddie

Freddie

I had all kinds of problems last year when transferring back to them from Talk Talk. None of which were caused by Talk Talk I should point out. every time I tried to get the line official they sent me another letter telling me they were coming to connect a new line for £171.00. No matter what I said they couldn't understand that all I wanted was for them to take the line back. I still had a full service throughout but nobody was billing me. My concern was obviously that they would eventually work it out and I'd get a massive bill all in one go. It dragged on for about ten months and in the end it crossed the desk of what BT call "The Chairmans Office". I'm not sure if that actually means what it sounds like but once it was there it was quickly resolved. They were excellent although until it got that far BT were worse than useless. I was given a direct telephone number for that office. if I can find it then I'll post it here and people can shortcut the idiots that cannot resolve anything.
The worst bit for me was that the Chairmans office eventually admitted that if I had said nothing they would NEVER have been able to trace that I had an active, free of charge (both line rental and call cost) phone line. I would never have had to pay again. I guess my honesty has cost me this time but I don't really mind as I am receiving the service. It would have been nice though :-)
28/05/09 Freddie
-17
Ex BT customer

Ex BT customer

Have you tried writing a letter? It works out cheaper and often more effective than spending hours on the phone to Bangalore. Make sure you send by registered post though.
27/05/09 Ex BT customer
-22

FEATURES

Gripes the News
Gripes in the pipes
The Soapbox
spinner