Cyclists on the footpath
12-March-2010
*
* Your Gripe Gripe List Quick Gripe Comments Gripe Poll Resources Contact Us Advertise Home *
* prev
next *
 

Cyclists on the footpath

Leave a comment Leave a comment 
Related Gripes Related Gripes 
Random Gripe Random Gripe 
Feedburner Gripes by email 
 
 

I can sympathise with cyclists when they say that they feel unsafe and threatened on our roads due to the amount of traffic and of course through the actions of selfish drivers.  Traffic volume has increased quite dramatically over the years and our cyclists on the road are not always well catered for.

A sign for cyclists advising them to dismount

What I don't understand is why some of them, when after they've acknowledged that a fast moving metal object can seriously injure someone, ride their cycles on the footpaths, weaving between people, creating obstruction and generally risking the health and wellbeing of pedestrians, in order to avoid being injured on the road themselves.  Pedestrian crossings seem to be fair game to them as well.  Children and especially the elderly stand very little chance if hit by a solid speeding handle bar in the ribs or step out of a shop and into the path of one of these inconsiderate individuals.

Not only that but when confronted about their antisocial, illegal and dangerous "driving habits" they either immediately assume the moral high ground and arrogantly tell you to get out of their way, or you're ignored as if you don't exist, the very same behaviour described when they complain about inconsiderate motor vehicle drivers on the road.  If you wish to come off a stretch of road and use a footpath, get off your bike and push it.  It's the law.

Just one example; not so long ago my wife and I were on holiday in the Lakes and were walking along a narrow footbridge which clearly bore the sign, "Cyclists Dismount" and even had a picture of a bike with a red line through it as you entered onto the bridge itself.  Halfway across the bridge and we were forced to squeeze ourselves to the side as a cyclists came past, tutting at the inconvenience of our presence and having had to slow down. Of course we were just ignored when we pointed out and quoted the signs at either end of the bridge.

Would any cyclists who do this like to explain why they put others at risk of injury, I'd be interested to understand the reasoning for your actions.

Cycling is a popular and healthy alternative to the motor car with the obvious environmental advantages, but please, don't justify your actions by saying that cycling on the road is too dangerous for you and then transfer that danger to the pedestrian on the footpath.

Thank you.

By: Sandman


Other Related Gripes

Size does matter if you're a pedestrian
Highway Code - drivers don't bother to indicate
Nearly run down by a mobility scooter
Pedestrian and zebra crossings ignored by drivers
Horses have a right to be on the road too!
Pavement parking a danger to pedestrians
Cyclists, accidents and the law
Horse manure on the footpath
Dangerous motorcyclists risk lives
People expect cyclists to bend over backwards
We've got idiots on the road
Parking on the pavement
Car drivers forget Highway Code
Motorcycles and the law
Cyclists riding on the pavement
Cyclists jumping traffic lights





Visitor Comments

Please read this before you post

Enter your comments in the space below

Name or nickname


Remember my name



 
I can understand your gripe...but I have a local cycle-path near to me which has a completely separate foot path next to it...yet various people which include parents with their prams often walk along the cycle path instead of the footpath...............

This slows me down as I have to stop or take a detour over grass and also puts me out of sync/rhythm!

I would hate to think of the consequences should a cyclist be going along quite fast and come around the corner or over the brow of a hill and suddenly see two prams in the way whilst two parents 'have a natter' with each other.

(P.S: I am _not_ a cyclist who jumps red lights, by the way).
*Cyclist Charles  12-Mar-2010 08:49

 
Alr,

why is the idea of insurance for cyclists "ridiculous"? If you injure someone while illegally cycling on the pavement or riding through a red light why should you not have to pay their medical costs or made to pay other costs in the same way as a guilty car driver would ?

Why should cyclists get away with illegal and dangerous actions and always expect to not be held responsible for their behaviour ?
*Pedestrian  28-Jan-2010 20:07

 
To answer this - "I find if you take the saddle off their Bike then fill it with Sand this tends to annoy the selfish twats, make sure you do it when its chained up and no ones watching though ;)"

I find that if you catch someone doing this to your bike, making them sit on it with the seat missing soon sorts out "their" selfish behaviour.

Watch you don't touch my bike when your out an about Mr Bellend.
*AnotherBiker  25-Jan-2010 16:47

 
Please don't tar all cyclist with the same brush.
When I used to cycle with my bamp, when we had to go on the pavement we would always make way for pedestrians, or if it was too busy dismount altogether.

And as for Me's idea on insurance and tax, that is an absolutely ridiculous idea.
Also, if I found you meddling with my bike, putting sand in the saddle or doing anything to it, we would be having words.
*Alr  18-Jan-2010 21:20

 
Cyclists and pavements do not mix well, despite the thought of an increasing number of cyclists. In the past, I've even been threatened by cyclists, who offered to deck me, so I wouldn't have to get out of their way on a pavement in future. I would not be surprised to find, that these same people when in cars, were the type to cut corners/juctions, park on pavements and speed along, trying to kill every other road-user.
*Kryton  03-Jan-2010 13:50

 
Anon. 29 Dec. 09

It is precisely your arrogant and condesending attitude towards others that inspired my original gripe.

Your only justification for putting others at risk of injury is that "it's not against the law". (i.e you won't be caught and cannot be prosecuted so it's ok to injure someone).
Obviously any idea of morality is beyond your under developed thought processes and all that you have achieved to do is strengthen the argument as to why cyclists should not be allowed to ride their bikes on footpaths.
If you where cycling down a narrow street and I adopted your attitude whilst driving a car and decided that you were "selfish" and "ignorant" in blocking that street, does that mean that I should have a "legal right" to force my way past you and risk your health?

Just so that you understand. The question is rhetorical. It's there to make you think about your own attitude towards others.
*Sandman  02-Jan-2010 17:28

 
GL sorry I should have made it clear that it was the election for the Mayor of London.
*annona  01-Jan-2010 16:40

 
Googled it, found out it will be the mayoral London election.
*Gainsborough lad.  31-Dec-2009 22:05

 
Annona, what will that 2012 election be then please? a local one?
*Gainsborough lad.  31-Dec-2009 21:58

 
Rori is right, these people that cycle on pavements are a danger to everyone around them. they don't take the least bit of care even in crowded areas. It is just the same where I live. Combine this menace with the ones that only have one hand on the handlebars, while they are using a mobile phone in the other,so they are not even trying to concentrate on pedestrians and it is no wonder that an ever increasing number of innocent people of all ages are being hit and injured by illegal cycling on pavements.

Me is also right they should be made to display some form of visible registration plate and number... so that when an individual hits someone (and they very frequently do) then they can be individually identified and reported to the police. At the moment they just ride off at speed knowing it is highly unlikely that they will ever be caught. Which makes them feel even more immune to any consequences arising from their actions. So they care less and less about other people and only their own self interest. Here in London Ken Livingston has promised that if he succeeds in his attempt to replace Boris Johnson (who was caught riding his bike through several red lights!) all bikes shall be registered. He has my vote come the election in 2012!!!
*ANNONA  31-Dec-2009 21:47

 
I am fed up with cyclists getting away with more and more selfish and dangerous behaviour. Cycling on the pavement has become almost the norm now in many places and if they hit you they don’t stop and even blame the pedestrian!

My local council decided that what we really needed in our ever more crowded London borough was an almost daily street market. They have allowed stall holders to spread their cheap and nasty tat over an ever increasing area of the pavement, beyond the agreed area, until there is often only about three feet between rubbish and shops for pedestrians, wheelchairs and pushchairs to squeeze through and still cyclists ride through as fast as the crush will allow! The police do nothing to stop them.

Today I saw a man of about 20 cycling around our branch of Asda with no member of staff having the guts to stop him. The loonies have taken over the madhouse.
*Rori  30-Dec-2009 20:05

 
They should be made to have road tax and insurance - just like cars.
*Me  30-Dec-2009 10:47


View more comments on this gripe


 
*   *
* © 2000-2009 The Weekly Gripe. All rights reserved. Please see our privacy policy and disclaimer.   Site Map *