Amazon negative feedback removed
I have a gripe with Amazon. They pride themselves on offering good customer service and offer the facility whereby past customers of items can leave 'feedback', thereby offering some measure of protection to potential customers. However, beware, all may not be what it seems. Amazon are able to 'suppress' customer feedback that is unfavourable to the seller, and they do this without informing the customer. With a simple click of a button, the feedback is removed and the customer - like myself - is left feeling disempowered and bitterly disappointed.
I recently ordered a USB car-charger for my TomTom SatNav, and what was sent was effectively a 'piece of junk'; it was not even the same item that was displayed in a picture by the seller on the Amazon website. I duly left feedback about this - very matter-of-fact, non-abusive feedback - that was, of course, very negative. I received emails from the seller trying to get me to remove the feedback, even to the point of trying to bribe me to do so. As a matter of principle, I resisted this, thinking that I was being a good customer by allowing my feedback to warn future customers that there money would be better spent elsewhere.
However, Amazon decide to stoop to the level of the seller, they removed my feedback without even informing me, or giving me any chance to amend. When I eventually found out, they just quote 'policy' at me that effectively said that the feedback could only be about the performance of the seller, rather than comments about the product itself. Uh? Does that make any sense? The fact that the seller was selling a piece of junk, and that it wasn't even what was advertised on the Amazon site, seemed to be irrelevant to Amazon! Crazy!
So, Amazon is yet another well-known company that essentially fails in its promises and only leads what best can be described in one word. Disappointment!
By: Shropshireman
Comments from visitors
As you know the battery market is full with counterfeit items, normally you can detect it by the price, but the problem is that I bought two Sony batteries for my video camera for 100 GBP (for this price you would think that it would be the real thing) in a third party seller in a transaction fulfilled by Amazon.co.uk and because I had doubts about the product I took it to Sony and they said it was counterfeit. I stated this in a feedback so that other clients would be advised, to my astonishment Amazon.co.uk simply deleted my feedback without informing me and now the seller continues to sell counterfeit items and I cannot place another feedback.
I think this doesn't help the clients of Amazon.co.uk very much, does it?
Elizabeth DH - 23-Sep-11 17:50
I will not purchase from Amazon Marketplace sellers in the future since feedback can't be trusted anymore.
I hope you are able to comprehend this.
I have had posts removed from GOW that were my form of humour, “the whistling turbo charger on a German car”, for instance. Hitler was humourless. People get annoyed by something they cannot understand such as turnips. People fight bullies with humour they always have & always will. If you have to explain humour to someone it is a bit sad. Like Baldrick sometimes. Bless him.
I'm more than capable of thinking for myself, thank you. I will express my opinions and it is a matter of total indifference to me whether others agree or not. Sometimes it is worth having a discussion on these matters, often not, which is why I don't reply to some of the more idiotic posters or those who are abusive or use terms of reference which mean nothing to me, such as the thread recently which degenerated into 'blessing', 'turnips' and 'Baldrick.
miserablemoaninggit - 22-Mar-11 22:31
miserablemoaninggit - 22-Mar-11 22:25
I do not need anyone's 'blessing', whatever that may mean. Keep your blessings to those who need them.
Finally, to those who think they are being bullied, if you are too feeble minded to defend yourself, then stay away or find a website for little children.
Note to site admin : Are you going to introduce a system whereby user-ids are protected? It would avoid a lot of the silly behaviour of some users by introducing some accountability.
miserablemoaninggit - 21-Mar-11 17:13
You agree to pay that price and the charges, so you felt it was worth it to you. You could also have found it for 16.00 at FAO Shwarz, but you didn't. More fool you for not doing your homework first.
The seller was devious, and you were foolish, but it's dog eat dog out there and you got eaten.





