Loading
 

Prince Harry, just leave the poor lad alone!

This might be a bit late, but I've just watched a documentary on the Royal Family and once again Prince Harry's behaviour and conduct was brought up.  Now this isn't a gripe about whether we should have a Royal Family, we have one, and they are there, and they are reported upon by the media.

But I'm sure that it must get extremely tiresome to hear people constantly commenting on your dress sense, your relationships, the way you live, where you live, where you work, and in Harry's case your parental heritage!

For a start, a lot was discussed when Harry went on active service to fight.  He was accused of being selfish by putting other soldiers in danger because he would be a 'bullet magnet'.  Well perhaps if the press had kept their mouths shut, and no one knew, there wouldn't have been a problem would there?

Then there's the comments he made that were labelled as racist.  While I do not think that his comments were particularly complementary, is he really the only soldier that ever said something like that?  I suspect (and as I don't know him, I don't know) that the tape wasn't meant for a public audience.  Why was it headline news then?  Was it because it was said by Prince Harry?  Would the country be in such uproar if Joe Bloggs said the same things?  They might not be happy, but I doubt there would be the same outcry!

Then there's his drinking and clubbing.  How unusual, a twenty something bloke going out and getting drunk and having fun!  He's just doing what everyone does!  Cutting loose and having some fun!  And as for the photographer that he got into an altercation with, he's not the only man to get into a scrap after a night on the tiles is he?  And he must have been pretty sick of having a camera shoved up his nose every time he breathes!  I think I would react in a similar way.

Buckingham Palace, leave Prince Harry alone... Leave the lad alone to do his job and live his life...

I know as a Royal he has a 'duty' to behave in a certain way, as he is a role model, but really, there's got to be a point where he can have a life surely?  The Royals are not the exclusive property of the public, and in my opinion anyway, deserve to have a life and choose the way they live it.  The average man in the street wouldn't stand to be told how to live his life and behave, unless the law was broken, so why should they?  Both William and Harry had to lose their mother in such a public way and had to grieve in the public eye.  That would be enough to screw anyone up, but they've hardly gone off the rails have they?

Leave the lad alone to do his job and live his life, he serves in the army and behaves like any other squaddie.  Good on him!

By:Live and let live!

Share on Google Plus

Comments from visitors

Post a comment

Enter your comments in the space below.

Name or nickname


Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sort:

Time to offshore the Royal Family: have a virtual head of state - use a Maharajah in india for this. cut the costs by millions every year. Make the Windsors redundant. Let them live on social security. Re-engineer the whole constitutional monarchy.

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Why Not? - 14-Dec-11 13:00 

Perhaps if all the royals were put on contraceptive pills of had vassectomies, United Kingdom would become United Republic within a generation or two. Long live the Republic.

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Citoyen - 4-May-11 22:03 

Why do the Royal Family need all this protection, if the whole lot were wiped out tomorrow, so what!!! It would not make the slightest difference to anyone, the govt would continue to run the UK exactly as it does now, mind you they would have millions more to spend on us with the Royal Scroungers gone!!
Maybe they should be rented out the USA for 6 months of theyear, made to attend functions and the proceeds could be used to pay their own way when they were back in the UK>

+5

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

artuk - 29-Apr-11 20:10 

"It costs the Met about £50m a year to protect 22 members of the Royal Family"

Personally, I'd say scrap the royal family and spend the money on something more worthwhile and better serving to the UK. What benefit does Joe Public on a minimum wage get from this? Absolutely nothing!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11967984

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

AOD - 12-Dec-10 02:28 

"By getting degrees in subjects like hairdressing, beauty therapy, international football business management, Madonna studies, knitwear, golf course management and celebrity journalism?"

Trimming the variety of courses is fine. Excluding all but the wealthy is immoral.

"How can we live without people who are fully qualified in all these subjects?"

You can scoff but those are the jobs our successive governments have left us with.

"Higher education is a privilege, not a right. It should only be subsidised by the taxpayer when the taxpayer can afford it"

The taxpayer cannot afford NOT to subsidize it. These kids are the future and before the hike, we were underperforming in education. This is a regressive policy.

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Guy Forkoff - 10-Dec-10 07:30 

If you try to rise above it by getting educated?

By getting degrees in subjects like hairdressing, beauty therapy, international football business management, Madonna studies, knitwear, golf course management and celebrity journalism?

How can we live without people who are fully qualified in all these subjects?

Higher education is a privilege, not a right. It should only be subsidised by the taxpayer when the taxpayer can afford it, and then only in a genuinely useful subject.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 10-Dec-10 07:17 

It's really fitting that Charles and his "sheath" should become embroiled in this. The kids have it exactly right. I hope they burn the House of Commons down in protest if this isn't righted. Our governments have given their jobs away, the remaining few jobs go to low wage immigrants. If you try to rise above it by getting educated, they try to stop you with obstacles like fee hikes. Then ponce Charles gets paint on his car and people sympathize!!?

-5

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Guy Forkoff - 10-Dec-10 06:49 

People power at last. Everyone should have the right to protest and the police should not get in the way. Where is democracy? Have the authorities had training in China?

What on earth was dear old charlie and his wifey doing in London when they knew there was this commotion?

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Rich and Poor - Black and whit - 9-Dec-10 23:55 

poor boy? Poor? He lives in a mansion or two and gets in the news once or twice and we feel sorry for the poor boy?

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

duh! - 9-Dec-10 23:29 

Waste of time, money and what a waste of land for one very extended family.
Just a bunch of pretty-faced do-gooders who do nothing meaningful for us. Born with a silver spoon and smile and wave and are so removed from real people.

Those who need them, crave for something that is missing in their own lives. Perhaps they should look else where and get real!

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Stop education cuts - 9-Dec-10 23:22 

How much does the Queen and Royal family cost other countries in the Commonwealth?

Nothing I expect. So why should we, in this country, have to pay anything?

I don't care that it only costs £1 each. Why should the role cost us anything at all? I didn't vote for the Royal family. I didn't vote for their expenditure. They are leaches on our economy. I would rather the money was spent on national health care.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Let's spend the national f - 9-Dec-10 21:25 

For god`s sake leave the poor lad alone. If he wants to go out with his friends to get hammered, he`s only being normal. I presume you think that Harry should be above all that.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Biscuitbum - 24-Nov-10 21:31 

Changing the subject slightly to Prince William and the forthcoming wedding to Kate what's her name. Who's going to be paying for this? Will it be Kate's dad? Because I bleedin well hope it isn't the tax payer. We're in the middle of economic hell with cuts everywhere, still at war and the country is quite literally going down the toilet. The last thing we need is to fork out for some pomp and ceremony for a bunch of plumb suckers.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Enough - 17-Nov-10 11:37 

Quote
Perhaps they should start charging fees for these services and then we would'nt need to have the civil list and they could finally shed the last vestiges of dignity.
Endquote

Ok, I don't mind if the Queen gets the minimum wage, after all its unski11ed work. You don't need a degree, or any qualification other than some vague genetic descent from Gort the Viking: even Prince Harry doesn't have to qualify for that.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Wages for Scum - 16-Nov-10 20:50 

Nothing wrong with Harry in fact I feel quite sorry for him.Its the rest of his family and hanger ons I find offensive.What is their point ? Surely even they must recognise the time for divine right by birth has long past.Their current role seems to be that of B list celebrIty whose only job is to be seen smiling whilst opening all manor of businesses.Perhaps they should start charging fees for these services and then we would'nt need to have the civil list and they could finally shed the last vestiges of dignity.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

imaynotagreewithwhatyousaybut. - 16-Nov-10 19:48 

Well G. Lad, that puts it into perspective. I think the latest figure for the Royal Family is more like 60p, but it's stil nothing compared to government borrowing.

The new government does seem to have some good ideas about reducing it: they are trying to get rid of some of the politically correct non jobs, like "diversity" officers, and a load of useless quangos and red tape.

I would like to see the Queen have a proper go at it though. She doesn't have anywhere near as much power as some people think.

-4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 26-Oct-10 08:35 

The Roytal Family should be outsourced adn offshored; their services sold off to the King of Norway or Sweden, or Queen of Denmark, Or to some defunt King of Greece in Cascais in Portugal, or sold off to some maharajah in India.

Let's save some real public money on this.

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Re-engineeRing the Constitutio - 25-Oct-10 20:54 

Harry is just a normal young man who likes to get hammered now and then. There`s nothing wrong with that, indeed it may be one of the few things he shares with common folk.

+5

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Biscuitbum - 8-Sep-10 20:23 

He gets paid £millions to be treated like that ... The right to slag off the monarchy is all the British taxpayer gets for his money!

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Ivor Penn - 26-Mar-10 02:00 

The men in grey have got hold of all your IP addresses, money talks, expect a ride in a Merc.

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Windsor girl.. - 31-Jan-10 20:34 

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sort:

Close

Enter email to receive updates:RSS Feed

Twitter