Absent father: 'I think about her everyday'
|
My daughter's absent father left when she was a year old. After less than a handful of visits over the next 12 months or so he had no contact with her for a year or more. Next he left the country and, yep you guessed it, no contact for 3 years. On the rare occasions he, or his family, did see my daughter it was always at my instigation, and I would walk on eggshells, trying to be on my best behaviour in the small but ridiculous hope that he would become the father he'd promised to be when she was born - so no arguments, no questions, no blame, no enquiries about money, no boat-rocking, nothing. |
|
|
The few times we did see each other we even got on quite well, having days out together or going to the odd pub/party. When my daughter and I visited his family and he wasn't there I didn't even ask his whereabouts. That's how muted and beaten-down they had me! His absenteeism and lack of financial support was always the 'white elephant' in the room that no one dared mention, yet everyone would happily sit and berate the parenting of other females attached to the family! Eventually I suppose it was easier to have nothing to do with me or my daughter, as evidenced by the fact her photo wasn't on display, along with those of the other grandchildren, in anyone's house! And yep they never called either! |
|
|
And then one day he "gave in" (his words) to some young girl who'd been chasing him down for years and following a (deliberately?) 'accidental' pregnancy he became a father again. Next he got married, more pregnancies followed and he finally transformed himself into a model Dad to all but the daughter we'd had together ... ... and I gave up even trying to somehow mould him and his relatives into the family we needed. So for another good few years we had no phone calls, no visits, no birthday cards or Christmas presents, no maintenance payments. We got nothing. The new family got everything, which is just how the wife wanted it! So our daughter is all grown up now and, following a final prod from me, he's finally started paying her 'pocket money' and sending the odd stilted emotionally-void email. He tells me "words can't say" how much he loves her and that he has thought about her everyday ... But love is in actions not words and I don't understand how anyone can think about someone else so much and not DO anything, not call, write, visit? How? Why? Please someone tell me WHY? I've since learnt, through child-protection training, that emotional neglect is a form of abuse. From the start, instead of championing us, he has been our greatest abuser, our worst enemy! I don't know why, I can't understand why, I don't get the sense he could begin to answer these questions either. My only thought is that he took the greatest revenge on me he could by punishing our child - and I am beyond grief stricken for all three of us! |
|
Comments from visitors
eg. [www.]menshealth.uws.edu.au/documents/NONRES%20FATHERS.html
Shame the absent dads themselves don't write more about what's going on for them. Less silence on the subject would be a very positive step forward!!!!!!!!!
She is suffering terribly, no confidence, low self esteem believing herself to be a freak and he can and will continue to cause her untold pain.
We are all born equal; first and foremost human beings, regardless of gender. We are partners in this crazy ride of a world. We are interconnected, literally and figuratively. There is only one solution to the world's woes - more understanding, more love, more support and compassion, and a good deal less hate, bigotry, judgement, and blame!
Whilst there may be women who appear to prevent well-meaning men from seeing their children (for reasons that may remain non-discernible to others), repeating this snippet of 'wisdom' over and over merely serves as 'mystification' (read some classic feminist texts if you have no concept of what I'm talking about). The fact remains that there are more than 1.5 million lone-parent families in this country, over 90% female-headed, and a common complaint amongst them is that fathers are CHOOSING not to be a part of their children's lives. I suspect, in many cases, this is a legacy of a their own experience of being non-'fathered' by emotionally and/or physically unavailable men (see the extensive body of literature on the recycling of trauma through families). Others appear unable to separate out their feelings towards the mother from their feelings for the child (as Dave's post hints at), or perhaps they so value the pleasure principle over the reality principle, that they fail to comprehend that karma catches up, ie., only the most sociopathic of parents won't find their future life tainted by a decision to alienate themselves from their own child/ren - s**t like that will leak out eventually and make an unholy mess over any nice-new-shiny-clean life one may manage to get for oneself!!
(1) Love not War! - 1-Apr-10 03:33
The only thing to do is to invest time, love and resources into your children (some of whom might even be female) - and maybe a lot of patience too if you do end up in a difficult scenario (nothing remains static, all is flux, you get to decide whether you work steadily towards resolution or fast-track into disintegration) - and improve life for everyone concerned including yourself, your kids, your extended family, any future partners and kids, and the rest of the whole freaking world by extension...
(2) Love not War! - 1-Apr-10 03:32
Im not for one minuet saying men should be second class citizens like women have been for years, just get of our back and climb down the pedestal you have climbed upon and accept that women are in the work place and can maintain home/work balance.
Im not a 'feminist' just a realist (i would never burn my bra cost too much money!).
I work because I enjoy it and to take some of the financial strain from my husband. Im not 'power happy' or shout iam woman hear me roar......i am me...a wife, mother AND employee.
And a serious question now! Have you ever seen Harriet Harman and Jacqui Smith in the same room together? I know it sounds crazy but I cannot tell them apart? Are they the same person?
Gainsborough lad. - 3-Mar-10 10:29
Divide and conquer was the tactic of our government and you ladies were the weak link they targeted. Never in their wildest dreams did they imagine how exploitable the modern woman was.
Yes, rampant consumerism also plays a large part; but how many women work and pay someone else to look after their kids? Why? These kids today with mobile phones, computers, ipods and all the other cr*p are no happier than the kids of previous generations.
I'm not saying that a woman's place is in the kitchen (being one myself), but I don't think the feminists have done us many favours. If one parent has a career it can be either, but two careers and children very rarely works well; the kids often end up spending more time with the nanny than either parent, so what was the point in having them in the first place?
It does also have to be repeated; feminism has led to the victimisation of men in many ways, such as tv adverts which make fun of men. It would never be allowed the other way around!
grumpyoldwoman - 3-Mar-10 08:29
The economy cannot support the narcissistic feminist dream anymore. You want to work but expect a year off with pay for every kid you have, you should get that promotion simply as you have a fanny, and anything that does not go your way is sexual discrimination. When did women turn into this hideously weak minded mess? You have sold out your children you men and yourselves to the state. You have not climbed life’s ladder any higher, you just helped the state push men back down it. And as men have already worked out the ladder goes nowhere anyway
I really do think you need to get your self the love of a good woman then maybe..just maybe you will see that just because women don't have d1cks doesn't mean they cant go to work or call the shots...you said it your self its 2010 not the pre war when a woman would never back answer her husband.
The Battle of the sexes is a joke! Back in the day suffragettes had a damn good argument. Yes they were right to fight for the vote but this all started in 1897 when Millicent Fawcett founded the “National Union of Women's Suffrage” and then in 1903 Emmeline, Christabel, and Sylvia Pankhurst formed the “Woman’s social and political Union” sort of hijacking the movement (just like one of those nasty men would). As I said these women had a point and through great personal sacrifice and suffering they won their fight. But times have moved on girls the feminist movement has been exploited by government to prop up the economy. Think about it girls, it’s simple economics the government doubled the amount of available labour over night and now that all you empowered wonderful women are working every our god sends, They have began to import labour from over sea in an uncontrolled immigration nightmare. They stole the whole feminist ideal from you and use it for the economy, you did not fight your way out of the kitchen. You were dragged out and exploited by the government, you were dragged out to undermine your men in the same way that immigrant labour is being used to undermine us all now.
Drop the feminist pipe dream it’s over, Just choose family OR career.
We are dealing with a women here who had been going out to work 4 night shifts for a period of time but had actually only been working two and leaving my partner with their kids whilst she was fueling her sex crazy antics. She left him in an incredible amount of debt and we are making headway with that but is insisting we take her to court to try and maintain contact. We are seeing first hand that some women have no shame and their needs come before the needs of their children! I have seen this situation before despite going to family court, theoretically he still has access to his children but in reality there is a problem every time he goes to collect the children for access!
sad and angry - 29-Jul-09 11:10





