Traffic calming measures
17-May-2008
*
* Your Gripe Gripe List Quick Gripe Comments Gripe Poll About Us Site Map Resources Home *
*   *
 

Traffic calming measures

Bookmarking, Google, Yahoo, MSN, Digg, Delicious, Redit, Furl and many more Add To Any >> 
Feedburner Subscribe to feed >> 
Other Related Gripes >> 
Email To A Friend >> 

 
 
I have a choice of two routes to work, a busy dual carriageway (usually gridlocked at various points, lots of minor accidents, very stressful drive) or a quieter country road through the villages and fields (quite relaxing, light traffic).
Traffic Calming Measures Owing to the county council placing badly timed traffic lights on the roundabout junction which leads onto the dual carriageway, most people choose to take the country route rather than sit in long queues of traffic waiting for the lights to change.  Fine, there are a few more cars trundling along the country roads but nothing heavy and still no gridlocked stretches.  However, the residents of the villages are not happy with people using “their roads” as so called “rat runs” and we drivers have been subjected to protests in the local papers, speed traps and “this is your speed” warning devices.

But now the villagers have persuaded the council to put in “traffic calming measures”.  So picture this, the road into the village goes over a small hump backed bridge, barely wide enough for two vehicles to pass as it is.  The traffic calming measure is an island of bricks which protrudes into the road so that people travelling into the village have to wait and give way to people coming out of the village.

Now, there are two major problems with this.  The “protrusion” is at the start of the hump, so whilst you wait behind it you can’t see any cars coming over the hump and have to edge out to see if you actually have right of way, if you haven’t you are so far out you either have to risk the wrath of the driver approaching and pullout anyway or reverse back, so annoying the people in the queue behind you who have followed you out assuming you can see over the hump.

Problem number two is that in the morning far more traffic is coming through and out of the village and the traffic trying to get into and through the village (to the dual carriageway) queues up.  Thus, rather than “traffic calming” they are creating yet more queues and yet more infuriated drivers.  OK, people decide to live in the country for peace and quiet and to avoid traffic but in this day and age cars are a way of life and the people will choose the quickest way to work whatever.


Other Related Gripes

Chaos at yellow box junctions
Speeding fine by text message
Road pricing policy a bad idea
Traffic signs left behind
Speed humps and mini roundabouts
So your village is a rat run
Speed cameras not the answer
Roundabouts built too high
Car parking for the selfish
Dangerous driving on a narrow road
Driving lessons, wrong time and place
Slow drivers are dangerous too
M25 traffic and the lack of information
Another speeding fine
Commuting to work by train is just a joke




Sponsored Links


Visitor Comments

Please read this before you post

Enter your comments in the space below

Name or nickname


Remember my name



 
just read the artical on traffic calming and must say I do agree on the aspect that yes people will take the quickest route they can find after all I do myself and yes the council may well have placed them in the wrong place however I still think there a good idea I wish I could persuade our council to do the same. the driver in question may well be a good driver and stick to the limits however not all drivers are and thats the problem the council dont just spend the money on traffic calming because a couple of people complain theres months somtimes years of debate over it.and no I dont work for any council its quite unbeliveble that I would defend them as my veiw of councils in general are quite low. still the fact remains traffic calming is a good idea and it saves lives not just pedestrians but drivers to ok its a bit inconvienient but so what this day and age there is that many cars on the roads you carnt help but get slowed down and after all why not just leave home a little earlier and take it easy I dont know about the driver that wrote the story but I would hate to knock anyone over and worse still if I was speeding. and like they say if you dont like it go another way.
*keith  10-Apr-2008 22:40

 
And even better we have Sat Nav coupled to Speed Camera alerts and Laser diffusers... bring it on. Perhaps if the government didn't persecute us on the main roads we would not have to drive thru the nimby villages, so complain to your MP and Council, until then ... Coming to a village near you... Sat Nav tourism!
*Sat Nav Tourer  19-Mar-2008 09:09

 
Horray for the sat nav. Now we can take even more obscure diversions through really small villages to avoid the congestion at the push of a button.
*Technolover  22-Feb-2008 18:28

 
Everybody has the right to complain. Nobody but the government or council can dictate wether people can go through a village, none of you OWN the road. I know, living next to a road must be such a pain. All these cars........ travelling...on a road....next to your house....thats been built for use.......by cars.....for PUBLIC USE.

However!, I do not condone or try to defend the people speeding through built up areas as my brother was recently hit and left with 2 broken legs and a fractured pelvis, by someone caught doing 52 in a 30 zone, and proceeded to speed off.

All of this stupid, obsessive behaviour about roads BELONGING to a certain place or people is nonsense. The public has every right to use them, but use them responsibly, if the problem worsens, then calming measures should be introduced.
*Laughable.  20-Jan-2008 14:32

 
What a fantastic result!

If you don't like it, use the dual carriageway like you're supposed to :-)
*Spudboy  16-Oct-2007 20:53

 
Take a leaf out the book of the people of the Chiapas region in the southeast of Mexico.

There the people take the "law" into their own hands. They lay large Sleeping Policemen across the main roads passing by or through villages, and when any strange car or coach passes the humps cause it to slow right down, they stop this vehicle and then demand $1 tax in cash each from its occupants.
*Pancho Villa  25-Jun-2007 17:28

 
AAAAAAAARGH!!!! Do you know what really gets on my toot? Busybodies that spend four hours using a borrowed speed gun to detect the speed of vehicles driving through your little corner of the Earth and then running crying to the police whinging and whining that "something must be done!" How sad and pointless their miserable little lives must be.
Go write to the Daily (hate) Mail you useless old farts.
*Jeremy Clarkson  25-Jun-2007 15:48

 
Village life is being lost by traffic. The amount of traffic that goes through the village I live in is terriable. I feel we are loosing the English way of village life and villages should not be used as rat runs for people trying to get to the busy towns and cities. Far enough people have to get to places, but that is why there are moterways like the M3 where the roads are actually built for the amount of traffic of today, unlike many villages. Personally people should only use village roads if they have buisness in the village or wish to get home!
*Dan  20-May-2007 12:21

 
Traffic calming measures are not just a pain in the neck, alot of them are plain dangerous. I've lost count of the times I've had to screech to a halt because of stupidly placed priority ways and pinch points. Reflective bollards are not always that helpfully placed either. Speed bumps don't really bother me so much, only when people go ridiculously slow over them.

As for speed limits, I think alot of them are again, stupidly placed. I'm talking fast speed limits down narrow winding country lanes, and also stupidly slow speed limits in unnecessary places.

People get run over cause theyre stupid, crossing a road isn't hard. Seriously. (I'm gonna get run over for saying that now).
*Frstsg  15-May-2007 23:37

 
I also use Ringmead when I take my daughter to Easthampstead park school from Prietwood every morning, and I have to say I find it a nightmare to negotiate these so called traffic calming measures the reason being that far from calming traffic they have the oposite effect in so much as they cause motorists to get angry with each other when one driver attempts to drive through when its not ther right of way (not my idea of calming!)
Another problem is a lot of the time one car may have to wait while more than twenty cars come the other way and gives the impression of losing time and being late this causes drivers to speed up above the speed limit once they have passed the artificial obstruction.I don`t know what buffoons thought up the idea of chicanes,but I can only conclude that they are not motorists themselves.
In conclusion ther are other better and more sensible ways of slowing vehicles down I.e speed limit signs that are triggered by cars exceeding the speed limit, I write this as a driver of 43 years expieriance driving on average 60.000 miles per anum.
*Alan S.  23-Mar-2007 23:34

 
Hurrah for speed bumps. Get on your bikes! It'll all be gridlock on the roads in the next few years anyway.
*Cyclist  12-Jan-2007 14:37

 
Like a number of people who have entered comments here, I also live in a village (once quiet and fairly peaceful) with a 30mph limit, plagued with both heavy traffic and excessive speeding. Traffic calming measures have been absolutely essential; the accident rate is high, and two people have been killed in the past two years....not perhaps a high death-rate, but it's two too many.
A priority gateway protects many of the villagers from being killed on their own doorsteps, so to speak; and we are awaiting the arrival of a VAS.
It seems to be a hobby amongst many drivers to go village-bombing, taking the roads at excessive speed with no regard to residents or road conditions.
If traffic calming measures are holding you up on your way to work, then may I suggest you get up earlier.......or try another route. Although village residents may not own the road, they do live there and were probably there long before the traffic problems started. They do have rights. Either shut up or get to work some other way.
And.....I don't answer responses.
*fiftysomething  27-Nov-2006 18:59


View more comments on this gripe


 
*   *
* © 2000-2008 The Weekly Gripe. All rights reserved. Please see our privacy policy and disclaimer. *