Why do we need this Westminster Parliament?
17-March-2010
*
* Your Gripe Gripe List Quick Gripe Comments Gripe Poll Resources Contact Us Advertise Home *
* prev
next *
 

Why do we need this Westminster Parliament?

Leave a comment Leave a comment 
Related Gripes Related Gripes 
Random Gripe Random Gripe 
Feedburner Gripes by email 
 
 

The year is 2050.  This large Gothic building on the Thames was once a proud example of Great Britain's heritage but now it has fallen into ruin.

A central hall, divided by a long, cracked table, has benches on either side, all covered in mildewed, faded green leather.  At the end of the hall is a large throne, bulging with threadbare cushions (one of which has burst open to reveal a wad of antique pound notes).  The rain pours in through holes in the roof and forms puddles on the rotting carpet.  This building, once called The Houses Of Parliament, is dead.

The British people eventually lost patience...

Westminster parliament in the sunset

The reason it is dead is that the British people eventually lost patience with the greed and corruption exhibited by M.P.'s and they abolished the impotent institution.  They finally realised that all the country's laws were now made by the EU and were simply forwarded to Westminster in the form of orders to be followed without protest.

A better system was brought in: a group of Civil Servants checked the EU laws for spelling and grammar and then forwarded them on to County Councils, who put the laws into effect.  A few redundant M.P.'s were good enough to get jobs with the County Councils but the majority were last seen selling fish at Billingsgate.

The financial savings were colossal and Income Tax was reduced by nearly 5 pence in the pound.

My gripe is therefore simple: why do we continue to support and pay for this redundant Westminster Parliament?

By: Oracle2008


Other Related Gripes

Britain, Government and The Recession
Did you make your vote count?
Politicians squabbling amongst themselves
UK politics, a poor choice so why vote?
Here's what I think of our government
The government, environment and oil money
Waste removal and recycling policy
UK Council Tax system doesn't work
Why are English people so cold?
Misrepresentation in Parliament
Wake up to common sense
Politics and the state of the world today
Cash for honours scandal
Democracy or Dictatorship?
The truth in politics
Over worked and under paid
Tony Blair's little France
Over taxed by 'New Labour'
UK fishing industry almost destroyed
Time we withdrew from The European Union





Visitor Comments

Please read this before you post

Enter your comments in the space below

Name or nickname


Remember my name



 
Who needs our Parliament? Just turn on the Parliamentary TV channel on Freeview and you would think you have turned on Dave TV: two stand up comics performing a ridiculous comedy duo. an Abbott and Costello, a Laurel and Hardy show, while a Parliamentary chamber full overpaid, bloated sheep look on. Just think of the cost of the show and all its expenses. You are paying for this nonsense, and all it is is Repeats. The real business is never touched upon.
*The Real Scum Show  24-Nov-2009 07:18

 
Gordon Brown's leaving present
__________________________

Gordon Brown decided to resign.

His colleagues decided to name a railway locomotive after him. So a civil servant went from Whitehall to the Railway Museum at York, to investigate the possibilities.

"They have a number of locomotives at the NRM without names," a consultant told the civil servant. "Mostly freight locomotives though."

"Not very fitting for a prime minister", said the official. "How about that big green one, over there?" he said, pointing to 4472.

"That's already got a name" said the consultant. It's called 'Flying Scotsman."

"Oh. Couldn't it be renamed?" asked the official. "This is a national museum after all, funded by the taxpayer."

"I suppose it might be considered" said the consultant.

"That's excellent", said Sir Humphrey, "So that's settled then... let's look at renaming 4472. But how much will it cost? We can't spend too much, given the expenses scandal."

"Well", said the consultant, "We could always just paint out the 'F'...".
*MikeP  11-Aug-2009 19:57

 
Let's have a vote. Who's worse? The Great Train Robbers or The government or The nation's bankers?

Who's worse? The Kray Brothers? The government or the nation's nankers?

Who deserves to be locked away forever?

Would Broadmoor suit any of them?
*Lock 'em up for 30 years at least  11-Aug-2009 18:43

 
Have we forgotten the crooked bankers? Are we so incensed with our corrupt MPs that we have forgotten that they only stole a few bob, and not the nation's heritage?

Forget the Pratt's proposal. We need 500 years of foreign domination to rid our country of its present Godless establishment. Oh Serbia how honest were you!
*How Guilty?  30-Jun-2009 00:35

 
We most definetely Need our westminster parliament because the only alternative is the european parliament.Vote for anybody in Uk parliamentary Elections and vote for nobody in European Elections.
*Mike Pratt  29-Jun-2009 17:16

 
Mugabe´s government is more honest. I didn´t imply that they are any better than your lot. They are a bunch of thieving self-interested conmen. Just like Westminster.

The difference is that nobody expected anything different there, whereas in a so-called Western democracy one has higher hopes.
*MikeP  02-Jun-2009 16:29

 
Mike P - Robert Mugabe's government is more honest? Really? Go live there then.
*dobbo996  02-Jun-2009 13:31

 
I have been to work today and you know what, I feel much better for it. I really feel like I have done my bit, I have contributed.

I would be feeling like I had let the side down and more importantly, myself if I ever began to think I'd not assisted the home secretary, Jacqui Smith and her husband Richard Timney to the lifestyle they so deserve.

If my humble and wretched contribution permits Richard only thirty seconds viewing of adult material on Pay Per View at his own home in Redditch then, my contributory efforts were not in vain.

What an honour it would be if Richard was to call upon me. I would be on all fours, be his human footstool whilst he viewed his favourite channels on his TV.

I have the honour to be your obedient servant.
*Baldrick  31-Mar-2009 11:59

 
There's no money or value left in Britain to pass onto our children or future generations. It has all been squandered. Britain is in debtors' prison, for at least the next 150 years. We don't make anything anymore. We have nothing left to sell. We have nothing left to offer the world of any value. Start learning to live off turnips.
*Tradesman's Exit  04-Jan-2009 09:52

 
yes our government is a sham, the idea that europe dictate our laws is a disgrace, we the public should be the ones dictating our laws/policies to our government by way of frequent referendums.
The control of our country must be put back in the hands of the public if we're to salvage any hope of a decent quality of life for our children.
There should be a quality of life act, with say commandments such as immigration, taxation, war, services etc which can only be changed by way of referendum. Any advocated change in policy should be debated live for the public.
I think its also necessary to have yearly general elections to limit the damage that one single party can cause and to increase competition.
*nik  04-Jan-2009 03:44

 
The fact is that most countries in Europe and their Govenrments and Assemblies/Parliaments are being reduced to the status of being little more than Town Halls, with their Prime Ministers/Presidents being little more than glorified Lord Mayors. Those which have Kings, Queens or Grand Dukes, these people are little more than mace-bearers, gene-carriers of some long-lost forgotten tradition. Slowly the map of Europe is being broken up into ever smaller national units. The map of Italy and Germany/Holy Roman Empire was like this 200 years ago. Napoleon had vision, but he was put down by vaster stronger historic autocratic forces. Europe did not evolve for 180 years after that.
*Stand Up and Be Counted  03-Jan-2009 08:24

 
The crisis the country faces may soon mean we will need a Government of national unity. God forbid, it will be a horrifyingly terrible institution. It will try to promote the values of the past 300 years.

The fact is this country needs completely to rethink what and how it works. What kind of economy do we want. How it will work. How do we reward people who work hard. And so on.

A national government will not be able to do this, as it will only serve the Establishment.

Ca Ira Ca Ira
*Towards Freedom  15-Nov-2008 08:50


View more comments on this gripe


 
*   *
* © 2000-2009 The Weekly Gripe. All rights reserved. Please see our privacy policy and disclaimer.   Site Map *