Loading
 

Here's what I think of our government

Gordon Brown Limited.  Everyday I see this mans face in the media and I always think what are we doing with this joke?  Seriously..  OK Tony Blair had his faults, but I was better off and never worried about my job, money, mortgage bills, that was never the case under Blair.  But now I seem to be very concerned about my future, and how I can pay the bills.

OK, the credit crunch is from the US housing industry, lending money to people that should not have received these loans.  Then of course oil prices go up to fill the gap and of course there's the Iraq war, but Gordon Brown was in charge of the UK purse strings for 11 years and not once planned for a credit crunch.

Also what about this whole 10p tax issue?  What I don't get is this, 'get children out of poverty' thing that he seems to bang on about, and yet he decides to abolish 10p tax?

Gordon Brown - 10p tax

Now on to the 42 day terror detention issue; he puts his time and effort into making this go through because apparently voters want it?  OK, if they do then why not spend time and energy in lowering fuel duty, because we DEFINITELY want that!  Then bring back 10p tax, or better still nobody pay tax on the first 10K of their earnings.  Such a bold move would pull a huge number of people out of poverty in one stroke!

I just don't get this man at all.  His opinion polls have slipped and when he stops speaking and does this irritating thing with his lip.  I kind of find that annoying for some reason...  He reminds me of one of those cocky math teachers that aren't all that good at teaching.  That's just my thoughts on Gordon Brown.

Anyway, Labour ministers close to him seem like him for a reason and I don't know why?  From day one when Gordon Brown took over from Tony Blair, this country has been nose diving into debt, anti-social behaviour and chasing laws through parliament that quite frankly are a joke.  I really wish MP's would pull there heads out of there Butts and start listening to the public for a change!

By: Mark

Share on Google Plus

Comments from visitors

Post a comment

Enter your comments in the space below.

Name or nickname


Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sort:

"We're all in this together."

Shame on you, David Cameron. You are a liar and a hypocrite.

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

iPost - 5-Jan-11 23:24 

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

anarco feminist - 5-Jan-11 22:59 

......and rich kids will have all the opportunities and poor kids will have little or none.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Coalition - anti family govern - 22-Nov-10 23:40 

Oh you poor people. We are a netherworld where the NHS is about to be dismantled, and where fat kids will be loafing on street corners because the funding for their school sports has been withdrawn. People in areas of high unemployment, (most places north of Birmingham), will have to sweep the streets or clean graffiti off walls to earn their benefit. If any of these poor people are homeless, the government might consider building hostels to house them. They could call them workhouses! Home ownership is becoming a pipe dream for the ordinary worker, but Cameron and the rest of his millionaires row cabinet are more concerned with targeting the feckless council tenents. Right to buy anyone!

-5

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Biscuitbum - 22-Nov-10 23:20 

My Only Wish is that Guy Fawkes was Caught just as he was about to Blow up the Houses of Paliament in 1605, They should have let him go and Awarde him a Medal for doing it,RIP Guy. In the 1990s he would have been known as a Hero

+3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Yvemaria - 10-Aug-10 09:37 

The government has just said they are putting up national insurance, they also said that they considered putting up vat instead, but decided on the former idea,

So, if you already have loads of cash, you are lucky, its buying power is still there,

However, if you still have to go out and earn it, it is now taxed more, it is called..........

"looking after the rich" by the Labour government.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Gainsborough lad. - 11-Dec-09 21:24 

Personally I've never had a problem with lyres. Harps, on the other hand, now there's an instrument you can't trust at all!

grumpyoldwoman

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

GRUMPYOLDWOMAN - 23-Oct-09 15:54 

I am always saying it all politicians are lyres and thieves when they are not kissing babes they are pinching there lollypops. So what as changed since robin hoods days? Well robin is long dead but the thieving sheriff lives on.

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

get it right - 23-Oct-09 13:49 

MikeP,
I would like to point out that in your comment of 23-sep 21:26, You made the following spelling error
"the rich get riched"
It should have been "the rich get richer"
You see?
It happens to all of us.
Think about that next time you point out somebody elses errors.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Noyoulistentome - 24-Sep-09 08:58 

Is the market in which a slave is sold a free market?

How much of the capital value of a firm can be attributed to its labour force?

How much benefit do the workers in that corporation benefit from "part-ownership" of that capital? [None in my experience.]

In this world of globalised monopolistic corporations, there is no free market for labour.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

e are all captive indentured - 23-Sep-09 22:24 

"Too much".

There, in a nutshell is the crux of the matter.

How to define "too much"?

From the perspective of the beggar then perhaps someone who has £100 is too wealthy. From the other end of the spectrum - £40bn may not be enough.

Do you define "too much" as more than you have, or more than the 'average' wage, or some random number, or what? It is, dare I say, entirely subjective.

And as for the 'point' of wealth, well that is just the way it is, it was and always will be. Even in the depths of Soviet communism there were commisars and proles. Rich and poor. Powerful and powerless.

I am content to accept that inequality is a fact of life and, provided I never pass a (genuine) starving beggar on the streets of Douglas or Ramsey (and there are one or two) without handing over a donation (I always do) then I can live with myself.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Manx Hound - 23-Sep-09 22:21 

What is the point of a single person having $40.0 billion wealth?

When is too much, too much?

When does wealth generation just become the simple looting of the resources of a nation or the world?

Is being super-rich being Green?

Was Genghis Khan evil?

What justification is there for capitalism?

Capitalism tends to degrade into pure monopolism which is of no advantage or good whatsoever for the consumer or workers. It is the avowed aim of every corporation to wipe out its competitors, or to take them over.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Band of Brothers - 23-Sep-09 22:03 

"As soon one class gets ahead it exploits the others. Generally the rich get riched and the poor get poorer, really poor"

It's called capitalism, Señor Che, and your system never really worked. Hay que entender un poco del historia del mundo, amigo.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

MikeP - 23-Sep-09 21:26 

ou brainwashed people are all suffering from brain haemorrhages. You have all had massive strokes.

There is only one way to run an economy and that is fairly. As soon one class gets ahead it exploits the others. Generally the rich get riched and the poor get poorer, really poor. The average wealth of a person in such an economy is far, far poorer than in a sharing economy.

It stands to reason that our nasty, greedy Thatcherite economy has gone far too far. Our lazy good for nothing aristocrats have had it too good for too long.

It is about time we spread a little reason in this world

Long live the Revolution.

-4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Ché - 23-Sep-09 20:38 

Grumpy old woman, your last comment is probably correct, I could realy see this happening.

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Gainsborough lad. - 23-Sep-09 19:26 

" There are always people coming up with this argument of sharing things out equally"

It's called communism and whilst in theory it has some merit, it has been proved in practice to be unworkable as it goes against the basic tenets of human nature and interaction. It was a failed experiment which costs the lives of millions through war, poverty, and genocide. It blighted countries across the world and many are still suffering as a consequence.

All you little pocket socialists, weirdos and lefties need to catch a wake up and understand that the class system, wealth and poverty, slavery, whatever you like to call it, is here to stay.

-5

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

MikeP - 23-Sep-09 13:57 

There are always people coming up with this argument of sharing things out equally. They unfortunately don't have the sense to realise that, if all the money in the country was shared out equally tomorrow morning, by the evening some would have spent it all unwisely and have nothing left, and others would be rich again.

-7

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 23-Sep-09 13:38 

Take all the money of the royal family then? what will that do? just give a few hundred idlers a free ride for contributing absolute xxxxxx all to society.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Gainsborough lad. - 22-Sep-09 23:09 

Manx hound is no idiot, its just more and more non-working people in this country think they can live off the workers, and the rich by higher taxation, this is not the answer, and the state of the nation is the result, taxing the rich will just result in more money for idle people wanting to join the idle club, people faking sickness, people not looking for work, women getting pregnant to live off the state, giving these people all this benefit is not the answer, the goernment should realise that living of benefits shouldn't be a career choice, it is now getting to much of a burden for the taxpayers, stopping benefits is the answer, there are always low paid jobs to start you off, giving more cash in benefits for idling at home instead of working will only encourage more of it. what will happen when there is ten or more million on the dole? don't anyone kid themselves, it is heading that way very fast.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Gainsborough lad. - 22-Sep-09 23:05 

Was the present Duke of Westminster successful? Was the Queen successful? Or have their families been robber barons for centuries?

Have they twisted the tax laws and inheritance laws to their own ends?

I consider them to be too rich. Do you?

Don't kid me they got their wealth through hard work.

Manx Hound is an idiot.

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Socialism is the only proper w - 22-Sep-09 22:33 

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sort:

Close

Enter email to receive updates:RSS Feed

Twitter