|
Back to that question about choice. It's an important issue this, because up until now we've enjoyed a relative amount of freedom in terms of what we get from our Internet Service Provider. Whilst peer-to-peer blocking, capping, bandwidth throttling etc. are somewhat irritating, at least you can rest assured they your privacy isn't called into question. You get what you pay for, a connection to the Internet and you can surf the sites you choose to without fear.
Phorm might not be big scary big brother watching your every move, but I think that it should at least be an opt-in service rather than something you have to opt-out of if you don't want it. As things currently stand most ISP's are taking the later approach and as you can imagine most people will be blissfully unaware and opt for the default package, phorm and all. To me this is wrong.
Personally, I don't think that Joe public is that interested in receiving more targeted ads with his daily digest. Current context sensitive advertising covers that and as for anti-phishing and fraud protection, all the current browsers already that built in anyway. If my current ISP (Demon) decide to go with Phorm I would drop them like a hot brick and choose a different service provider. Who says we don't have a choice?
Get inphormed and make your own mind up
General information about Phorm on Wikipedia
BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad
How Phorm plans to tap your Internet connection
The Phorm Files
BBC Phorm Q&A
Light the blue touchpaper (stand well back)
Phorm website
Detecting In-Flight Page Changes with Web Tripwires
|