Loading
 

Finding a good all round web browser

As part of my job I get to test web sites using various different browsers such as Mozilla FireFox, Internet Explorer, Safari and Opera.  It's good in a way because I get a chance to really play around and decide what I like best.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not one of the regular geeks who goes out to use obscure software just for the hell of it.  I'm actually really looking for the browser that's right for me and I have recently began to lean more towards Mozilla FireFox.

There's definately some good competition out there...

I haven't got much memory on my laptop and to be honest I found the latest version of Internet Explorer (version 7.0) a bit of a memory hog.  I have always been a fan of IE in the past but there's definately some good competition out there.  They've all got their flaws though so here are some of my thoughts on the current browsers. I tried them all with the same page loaded.

Internet Explorer 7.0 - Well it looks good and the use of "clear type" by default to smooth the edges of screen fonts seems to work quite well.  Actually, I think pages have always looked nice in IE so no gripe there.  It renders quickly and generally works very well.  However, my main problem with it is it takes up a large chunk of memory and the more pages you have, the more it consumes.  This may not be a problem for those of you out there with monster PCs, but with very little memory to begin with it hurts when you're browser takes an extra 20 to 30MB (especially if you have Photoshop loaded - another gripe I guess!).  Another thing I don't like about IE is the cluttered toolbar area and the big tabs.  It's just a bit messy up there.  All in all, I'm a bit undecided about Internet Explorer these days.  If I had the memory and a faster machine I'd probably keep using it.  (40MB)

Firefox, Opera, Safari, Internet Explorer Opera 9.26 - I've always had a soft spot for Opera and can remember using the early versions when Internet Explorer was fresh on the scene and about to slug it out with the then very popular Netscape.  Back then Opera was a favourite of mine because it was lean and fast.  Unfortunately it was let down by a few incompatible rendering characteristics.  It was bad enough having to code for two browsers and to be honest Opera didn't have much of a fan base at the time.  This latest version is really quite nice and I'd go as far to say renders not unlike Internet Explorer.  The memory usage seems to be about half that of IE as well so that's a big plus.  What's with these silly widget things though?  I like to use the Google Toolbar, but could only find this widget thing instead and that was less than useless!  Widgets are big mistake and I think Opera should have went with toolbars and add-ins likeFireFox.  (20MB)

FireFox 2.0 and 3.0 - I started off using FireFox 2.0 and initially didn't like it at all.  Being so used to Internet Explorer it took me a while to adapt.  Things improved somewhat when I set up "clear type" on my laptop and installed the clear type tuner from Microsoft.  The page became much more readable.  FireFox is a bit slicker than IE and I liked the "Find" tool.  However, other aspects such as file download and the really thick underline on bold text I find really quite annoying.  I just recently tried out a version of Mozilla FireFox 3 (beta 4) and personally thought that it was a tremendous improvement on FireFox version 2.0.  However, I've decided to switch back until they've brought it up to scratch.  I can't live without my Google Toolbar and there isn't one available for this version (yet).  Also, what on earth did they do to the "Home" button?  I got it back eventually, but it was a bit of a fiddle!  (28MB)

Safari 3.0 - Not sure where to begin with Safari.  Basically, I don't like it at all.  The look and feel isn't really my cup for starters, probably because I'm not a big Apple fan to begin with.  It seems to have a big footprint too (maybe that's just the Windows version) and perhaps the most annoying thing for me was the way the address bar works.  You click on it and then have to do a CTRL -A to 'select all' before you can type in a web address.  Every other browser I've used automatically does this when you click on the address bar and why would you want it any other way?  I also find the endless sea of grey a bit depressing.  One good thing I suppose, is that it probably gives any Apple user forced to use a PC a warm fuzzy feeling inside - well each to their own I say! (45MB)

Conclusion

There's a gripe with all of them.  I enjoy using different ones if for no other reason than that I get to make sure my pages work no matter the visitor happens to prefer.  I'm now pretty much torn between sticking with Internet Explorer and moving on to FireFox.  In particular, the new version looks like it could well be an IE killer and this comes from someone who once swore allegiance to Microsoft (I was young and I needed the money!).  It's a real shame that Opera isn't quite up to the job.  Other than those widget things its a very good browser.  Who knows what new innovations will come along in the next few years though.  The battlefield might look completely different then.

Share on Google Plus

Comments from visitors

Post a comment

Enter your comments in the space below.

Name or nickname


Sort:

Google Chrome increases market share again, IE slips.

http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=1

If you haven't tried Google Chrome yet, give it a go - http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/landing_chrome.html?hl=en

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Author - 4-Sep-10 12:48 

I'm a confirmed Chrome fan these days. Not going back to anything else, although I occasionally have to use the "IE" tab because some website owners are too stupid to test their creation on lots of browsers. Anyway, just dug this up in the news - may be of interest!

Safari 5 tested: Chrome, Opera still have JavaScript edge - http://bit.ly/d8P6GR

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Author - 11-Jun-10 17:46 

I only used to use IE and started to hate it (like the rest of windows) I found safari and that's all I really use now. Downloaded google chrome wouldn't work on pc still need to install and try on laptop. (pc win xp media center, laptop vista home premium.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Ryan - 26-Feb-09 22:51 

Yahoo, google and MSN are not browsers, they're search engines. Google do have Chrome, but apart from that those listed below are not web browsers

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Supernautus - 4-Feb-09 17:31 

Impressive list of web browsers and whilst I can't agree or sympathise with all that you've said, some of it is true. Personally I've always been a fan of Firefox until recently. I've been using Google Chrome a lot in the last month or so since it was released. You should give it a try. There are a few glitches here and there but its definitely one to watch. I also rather like Safari - perhaps that's no coincidence.

+3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Webjunkie - 7-Oct-08 19:52 

Konqueror is pretty good. It's got tabs, is a bit faster than Firefox and renders pages nicely. My feeling about IE is that it's bloated (hence the big memory footprint), rather ugly and lacks plugins/extensions. It's poor at standards compliance too - javascript and css, etc. Konqueror isn't immediately available for Windows, tho' (seems you can get it to work, but too much hassle factor for most users). Overall, go for Firefox.

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Steve - 22-Apr-08 10:04 

Hi, I found Dogpile.co.uk is a useful tool - it searches most of the major browsers such as Yahoo, Google, MSN etc

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

GazesAtStars - 13-Apr-08 13:28 

I've got to recommend Opera as my favourite browser. There's no messing about and it's now free as well. It has come on leaps and bounds since the early versions and in my opinion is a serious competitor for Firefox and Internet Explorer.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Dan - 31-Mar-08 02:25 

I recommend using K-meleon. It uses Gecko engine, but isn't a memory hog.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

capital-n-tilde - 23-Mar-08 22:10 

Phil, auto spellchecker decided on the spelling and I was way too tired to proof (slapped wrists!) I do sometimes use text based browsers, in fact used to use something called DosLynx many years ago and have used Lynx recently in fact.

I shall have to give SeaMonkey a go!

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Moth - 19-Mar-08 15:06 

I use Firefox for most of my work, with the exception of MS Sharepoint, and at that stage I have to use IE7 as Firefox encounters minor issues.
I'm not anti-Microsoft, I just like the feel of Firefox!
I use Opera Mini on my Nokia E51 and IE mobile on my work HTCS730.

You are right thought, most have niggles!

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Pugsy - 19-Mar-08 10:27 

Hey, nice article. You didn't mention Mozilla SeaMonkey, Galeon, or Konqueror!

I think a bit of explanation is in order as to why the browsers are different, and sometimes similar. Firefox, SeaMonkey and Galeon are all Gecko based browsers. Gecko is the Mozilla Foundation's layout engine. Safari and Konqueror are KHTML based browsers; KHTML is the layout engine from the K Desktop Environment (http://www.kde.org/). Internet Explorer is derived from NCSA Mosaic. NCSA stands for National Center for Supercomputing Applications. The founders of Netscape worked on Mosaic before starting Netscape. The codename for the original Netscape Navigator - Mozilla - stands for Mosaic Killer. Opera stands alone in having no sibling browsers, apart from Opera Mobile.

I prefer SeaMonkey to Firefox because I find the former more controllable. SeaMonkey doesn't try to hide options like Firefox does.

The download behaviour in Firefox can be changed in the Options dialog. The appearance of bold text in webpages can be changed using a custom userContent.css file in your Mozilla profile.

How about some text-only browsing in a console with Elinks, Lynx or Links? :-) Seriously. Text browsing is often useful. When you want as near as possible to an instant result, with no pics or ads, and a tiny footprint, text is the way to go. But then, web browsers are for sissies, aren't they? Telnet on port 80, real men do. :-)

Couldn't help noticing you capitalised "Firefox" with two capital Fs as "FireFox", but the Mozilla Foundation always calls it "Firefox". That's what it says at http://www.mozilla.com/.

-4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Phil - 19-Mar-08 01:55 

Sort:

Close

Enter email to receive updates:RSS Feed

Twitter