Unclear and misleading language
17-May-2008
*
* Your Gripe Gripe List Quick Gripe Comments Gripe Poll About Us Site Map Resources Home *
*   *
 

Unclear and misleading language

Bookmarking, Google, Yahoo, MSN, Digg, Delicious, Redit, Furl and many more Add To Any >> 
Feedburner Subscribe to feed >> 
Other Related Gripes >> 
Email To A Friend >> 

 
 

Can anyone explain the obsession nowadays with changing long-established, well-understood words for new words which are unclear and misleading?  Some of the changes are obviously due to Political Correctness but other changes seem to have been made purely to confuse us.

Take, for example, "Personnel Department", a clear description of an office which deals with recruitment and organisation of a workforce in a business.  This has been replaced, without explanation, with "Human Resources", a term which sounds as if it concerns employees laid out on a meat rack.  "Human Resources" itself has become too much of a mouthful: callers to my small business now ask to speak to "HR", Exactly what has been gained by changing 'Personnel' to 'HR'?

Some of these changes are actually detrimental to the running of the business.  I phoned my bank recently with a minor query and went through the usual series of menus, trying to get through to a bank representative.  Eventually I was offered a choice of "Balance" or "Agent".  Presumably "Representative" has now been replaced by "Agent" but this term sounds too much like somebody trying to sell me something.  I rang off.

There are countless similar examples.  Are you happy about our "Police Force" now being described as a "Police Service"?  Do our railways run more smoothly because we are now "Customers" instead of "Passengers"?  Add your own examples.

Unclear and misleading language, how did Personnel become HR?

This gripe sounds trivial but clarity of language is one of our defences against state tyranny and we should do more to oppose this constant distortion of familiar English words and phrases.  George Orwell showed so clearly in "1984" that destruction of a country's traditions and way of speaking is one of the first steps towards control of the population.  Today we have Hype and Spin: tomorrow we may see the setting up of The Ministry Of Love.

By: Oracle2007


Other Related Gripes

Why don't solicitors use plain English?
Captcha's that are too hard to read
A bad mannered eavesdropper
I am deaf you know, not stupid!
Britishness not taught to kids
School subject choices poor
Welsh language policy
So many problems still to solve
I am a man not a number
Shakespeare a load of old tosh
Dyslexia in a topsy turvy world
Sales and marketing jargon
Automated telephone services
School teachers that can't spell
Management jargon and phrases
Rudeness and foreign language




Sponsored Links


Visitor Comments

Please read this before you post

Enter your comments in the space below

Name or nickname


Remember my name



 
The gripe is perfectly valid and I agree with it. Having been out of the workplace now, as a housewife for many years, I have been overwhelmed at the changes in office and job descriptions, let alone general daily life. Junior clerks are now "administrative assistants" , for example, and there are numerous others with pompous titles involving the words "co-ordinator", "advisor", "administrator" , "operations" and God knows how many more. I wonder if it's all to do with psyching people up to make them think that they've got an "important" position in society?
I used to laugh every time Ann Robinson on "The Weakest Link" challenged her contestants to give a more concise description of their airy-fairy-sounding jobs. Certainly used to bring some of them down to earth with a wallop.
*overfiftys  08-Jan-2008 08:29

 
Read old books and newpapers and you see " A hotel..." but nowadays it's "An hotel..." Madness.
*Pericles  07-Sep-2007 00:42

 
Personnel dept = yuk. Human Resources = yuk. What's wrong with just

Staffing office?

Actually the renaming is simply a refelection of the fact that human beings are now simply ciphers, and of no real consequence to the business.
*A Mignon  03-Sep-2007 10:53

 
I agree the way officious people explain things to us poor mortals confuses that much that in the end we tend to give up anyway.Also peoples job titles change practically from week to week.Mine started off as classroom assistant then went to teaching assistant then teachers assistant and now its learning mentor.I do much the same job as I have for the past ten years but with a different title.Don't ask me why?
I think some of the worst people at tech talk are computer technicians.They tend to talk to you in highly technical language assuming that you actually know what they are waffling on about.I usually let them waffle for about half an hour then tell them that I don't understand a word they've said and could they repeat in simple terms.
*anon  31-Aug-2007 22:48

 
So are you saying, if the change has been made for reasons of Political Correctness that the change is valid, but not if it has been done to confuse?

Isn't political correctness an attempt to curb Freedom of Speech?

Something that results in a change of department name within an organisation - public or private is going to be the result of some Consultancy excercise carried out by the organisation. The silly changes reflect an organisation's poor managerial ability. The fact that such terms could be copied by others is just demoralizing. If the organisation was well managed, why would it need to buy into everything a consultancy exercise recommends?
*Chris  31-Aug-2007 11:38

 
trivial! the language we speak now has changed enormously from 200 years ago, our language has been constantly changing for better or worse since the first person formed his/her first syllable. Police force/Police service - noone would care if they did their job. Ditto personnel.
*ron  30-Aug-2007 17:18

 
You're right, the gripe sound sound and is trivial.
*yoyo  30-Aug-2007 15:51

 
>Are you happy about our "Police Force" now being described as a "Police Service"?

Well actually, no - not really. Personally I would have thought that calling them "Police Farce" would have been the right thing to do!
*Having a poke  30-Aug-2007 14:41

 
Totally agree.

I'd just like to suggest that maybe the Police are due another name change as they no longer appear to be a "Force" or offer a "Service". As a marketeer, I'd like to suggest the following:

Lazy Officious Doughnut Eating Kids Playing God.

I used to respect the Police but now I live in Worcester where they consider the real criminals to be the ones parked on yellow lines and not the ones selling smack to the kids.

Sorry....that's a whole new gripe.

Bring back our language!
*Beefmonkey  30-Aug-2007 12:48

 
Would that be 'prehaps' or 'perhaps' Angrydad? ;-)
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
*Freddie  30-Aug-2007 08:17

 
Before anyone corrects me it is a typo on my previous entry. I meant to type the word "thing" obviously, not "ting".
That having been said I tend to type so fast that I often change words so prehaps we should all be doing it!!!
*Angrydadcalledray  30-Aug-2007 00:28

 
I quite agree.
It does nothing but confuse things and companies spend money on this sort of ting which is even more unbelievable. Remember how much BT spent on changing its logo? Same principle.
I can almost understand it if the existing term is likely to cause offense (not mentioning a particular marmalade) but some terms or words seemed to be changed just to infuriate us.
I'm pretty sure that I heard somewhere that an arrested person has to be refered to as a "client", what?
Personnel changed to HR - Makes no sense.
Someone explain why we do this.... or is it just a load of old morlocks!!!!
*Angrydadcalledray  30-Aug-2007 00:26


View more comments on this gripe


 
*   *
* © 2000-2008 The Weekly Gripe. All rights reserved. Please see our privacy policy and disclaimer. *