Loading
 

Thoughts from a smoker

We have as smokers of the world endured the past, just short of a week the Smoking Ban, and it has proved to be exactly what I expected.  The majority of the pub users smoking outside, whilst people that you have never seen in the pub looking out with their smug grin for the first few days, and then not seen for the rest of the week as they are not usually pub people.  This is evident throughout the area in which I live and travel in.

Pubs and clubs should be given the choice

Whilst I can understand that as a non-smoker you are subjected to passive smoking, in the main users of pubs and clubs are smokers, but nevertheless the law is the law and so be it.  I would agree with restaurants, enclosed public areas and the like should be smoke free in general, but pubs and clubs should be given the choice to choose whether they wish to be a Smoking Establishment or not, and then subject to regulations concerning the ventilation of these establishments and this could be derived through specific determinations made from regulations.  Most establishments have air conditioning these days and air filtration can added to their system quite easily.

The smoking ban - thoughts from a smoker

In this past week I have noted how many soap dodgers there are, and the amount of people that need to go to a pharmacy and purchase some deodorant, and a number of people need to revise their diet, quickly.

In addition I think we have all forgot how much revenue that will be lost from this ban; the indirect funding that smokers have made to a number of the governments budgets through taxation on smoking products.  This lost income will have to come from somewhere, and all of the non-smokers that have looked upon people who smoke over the years as lepers, will soon be putting their hands in their pockets and paying more tax somewhere.  Possibly even a 2% rise on income tax.  Maybe this will take that smug look off their faces when they have pay out more in tax or many of the hidden taxes that we have to endure in this country.

The Spanish and the French got it right, ignore the government, but improve your air flow units and put up clear signs that the establishment that you are entering is a smoking establishment.  You have been warned, if you don't like smoking then be sensible and don't go into that particular establishment.  The individuals choice - remember Big Brother has taken ours as smokers away from us.

Revise the Law Mr Brown, dont revoke it, make it fair for everyone and remember as smokers we have funded this country for a long while.

By: JD

Share on Google Plus

Comments from visitors

Post a comment

Enter your comments in the space below.

Name or nickname


Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ..
Sort:

Good for you mate, keep on doing what you want. Don't cave in to the pressure of the PC crowd, it is your body, your life and I used to love smoking ciggies before I gave up. I must admit that I feel better for quitting, but it is your choice and I think the whole scare about passive smoking is a massive load of nonsense.

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Bexter BMF - 12-May-10 21:24 

Now I can't smoke in pubs I have to sit there subjected to fattys body odor. They hvn't banned soap you know.

Smoking is a lifestyle choice. Just as drinking is. Just like driving is. Just like moaning about others is.

You know what, all of the above can lead to death.

Smoking costs the NHS 400 million pounds per year. Revenue, tax blah blah is at 10 billion?

I have to laugh when watching the non smokers walking through a wall of smokers stood outside a pub door.


Once all of you do gooder non smokers eat healthily everyday at every meal, exercise everyday for a few hours, don't drink, don't moan and can drive perfectly, maybe, just maybe I'll stop smoking.

+10

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

chris - 6-Mar-10 00:25 

I would agree with the above letter writer. I am 75yrs old and apart from age related problems very well.
From the age of 4yrs old I was brought up in a pub, this of course was during the war and many people needed thier ciggies for a comfort of some sort. Every pub we had had a SMOKE ROOM so if you didn't want the smoke you had a choice and everyone would be happy.
I would like to know how much the government has lost in duty and over the last sixty years I have paid into this CLUB. I think I must have paid enough to make my hospital should I need it and we must rty to stop the nation becoming a DICTATORSHIP at any cost doing away with all these silly rules.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

audcol@tiscali.co.uk. - 5-Mar-10 18:55 

FAIR FOR EVERYONE !!

How is it fair that I come home from a club absolutley kippered because your selfish ass wants a fag?!

Hurryup and get cancer you stupid smoker.

-10

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Angry - 1-Sep-09 15:51 

Smokers smell bad all the time.
What they really need is a dummy.
I've seen pregnant women smoke and I find this particulary revolting.
Smokers are broke.
Smokers take too many breaks and cost employers lots of money.
Smoking is dangerous and treatment for the diseases caused my smoking is very high.
Smoking should be taxed just to help with the extra health care needed for people with smoking related illnesses.
Government will always find a way to tax us. They do it all the time. Council tax; TV tax (and what a lot of rubbish that is paying some dj over £600 k a year. I object to that. Inheritance tax; income tax - my god all it is tax. I'm surprised we have any money. They'll tax a fart if they could.

+3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

I hate the smell of ciggarette - 16-Jun-09 14:51 

I have been a smoker all my life, if we are going to put cigarretts under shop counters then why
not put alcohol under counters,as this seems to be just as bad for kids,lets stop putting drink ads on tv that make it look exciting and cool and cleaver to drink.
MP Alan Johnson says it costs the n.h.s 1.5 billion to treat smokers thats rich considering
smokers provide 8.5 billion pounds in taxes plus the billions that the three big tobacco
companies provide,how much does drinking related illness cost the n.h.s. to save smokers costting the nhs why not build smokers only hospitals with tobbaco taxes then they would be the finest hospitals in brittan, since the no smoking ban pubs have been closing,and people
have lost there jobs when the last pub in britain closes its door will the nonsmokers then be
happy I think not.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

jmb - 9-Dec-08 23:22 

Those who want to ban smoking have nothing but a semi-skimmed view of life and politics.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Keep on Smoking - 19-Oct-08 10:22 

Smoking should be banned in all public places before the whole nation is polluted by this bad habit.
I can't find the reasons for the people to smoke in public places while everyone knows the danger of smoking to smokers and non-smokers. If we want to build a strong nation we have to ruin whaever is preventing us from going ahead. Smoking is very bad to the smokers as well as non-smokers.It led to many diseases such as cancer and many others,it cause people to be addicted.

-5

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

ouma - 10-Sep-08 14:40 

Smokers should be shot. There's a nice tolerant attitude for you. It's a disgusting habit, smokers cause litter, it stinks, smokers don't give a damn about any one else - all in all it's foul.

-5

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Geoff - 6-Aug-08 13:43 

Carla
The total revenue raised through duty and VAT on tobacco is about 10 billion pounds per annum in the UK. I believe this is roughly equivalent to the NHS total annual spend on drugs in England and Wales. So if everyone stopped smoking there would certainly be a 'consequent impact on the NHS'. Probably not quite the one you imagine though!

+3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

H McCamley - 9-Jul-08 21:41 

I'm fairly sure that the logic behind the high tax on cigarettes is based on the illnesses that smoking causes, and the consequent impact on the NHS. So assuming things have been calculated reasonably well, if people are giving up smoking and therefore reduce tax revenue, in the long term it will balance out.

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Carla - 4-Jul-08 15:47 

Jen

You won't be saying that when then start to recoup the revenue lost through smoking via your perosnal tax code or through some other stealth tax that the Government may dream up to compensate for the loss of revenue smokers give the Government.

-8

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Charlotte - 10-Jun-08 11:31 

"In addition I think we have all forgot how much revenue that will be lost from this ban"


It's about reducing smoking, not making money. It's wrong that the government makes so much money from addiction, it's good they're actually doing something to reduce smoking.

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

jen - 10-Jun-08 11:28 

To evaluate if employees with asthma, chronic bronchitis or emphysema can be characterized as a population of patients with a high prevalence of psychological distress and/or depressed mood. Above all, we wanted to examine the influence of smoking status on the relationship between chronic disease and psychological distress/depressed mood. Methods: A postal survey was conducted among 12,103 employees participating in the Maastricht Cohort Study. Results: Smoking employees, who reported having asthma, chronic bronchitis or emphysema were more likely to report suffering from depressed mood compared to smokers with no long-lasting disease (prevalence rate, PR: 29.3 and 9.0%, respectively; OR for depressed mood = 4.04; 95% CI: 2.56–6.39) and when compared to smoking employees with a history of heart disease, hypertension or myocardial infarction (PR: 18.1%; OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.07–3.68), or rheumatoid arthritis (PR: 20.1%; OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 0.96–3.11). Conclusion: These findings provide health care professionals with additional evidence regarding the importance for including the assessment of psychological distress and depressed mood in the routine evaluation of the patient with asthma, chronic bronchitis or emphysema, especially with regard to smoking cessation.

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Psychological DIstress of Non- - 27-Apr-08 22:58 

Well said Jeff.

Because smokers do not consider others, they are quite happy to make you retain the foul stench of stale tobacco. Good riddance to that now we have the smoking ban!

+11

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

The Man - 26-Apr-08 00:31 

Quote "In this past week I have noted how many soap dodgers there are, and the amount of people that need to go to a pharmacy and purchase some deodorant, and a number of people need to revise their diet, quickly"

Yes, I've noticed that in pubs as well and it just demonstrates to you smokers how bad the product of your habit smells if it can cover up the smell of these atrocities.

Also thanks to the person calling himself "not all smokers are selfish" If all smokers, and indeed people in general had the same attitude as you, the world would be a much better place.

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

jeff - 23-Jan-08 18:46 

Smoke On

What a cnob head you are!

Where in anyone's post did it say that passive smoking increases blood pressure (although there is evidence to say that it certainly increases the risk).
The reference, I believe, to this condition was supposed to make a parallel between circumstances and influences that can effect (not cause) peoples health. If you had read the post properly you would have seen that, you bloody moron!

Its a good job you can type, otherwise people here wouldn't know that you are an idiot!

-11

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Down with Smokers who cannot r - 23-Jan-08 08:06 

I had high blood pressure on and off for 7 years of my life while I was living at my parental home. This was from the ages of 17 to 24. I also suffered from very bad (to having bleeding sores) eczema and asthma. The time in which I was not suffering from high blood pressure or asthma I was at university (19-21) these conditions resumed with me moving back home. My parents gave up smoking just after I turned 25. I am still living at home; we still live in the same area, eat the same food, and have the same pet dog. I suffer from none of the above conditions anymore, other than asthma when I visit my grandmother who still smokes or a little dry eczema in the winter. I wonder what could have been the cause?

+6

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

personal reference - 22-Jan-08 21:46 

Well the Health Fascists are up and about.

Prove with personal reference that "Passive Smoking" uniquely causes raised blood pressure above and beyond all other environmental causes. Otherwise keep your quackery out of this forum. Shut the quack up!

Health Fascists lie!

+9

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Smoke On - 22-Jan-08 21:17 

Anon,

Give it up.
As you see, when presented with a non insulting response, you get no reply.

Its lucky you havent been abused already!

0

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

another anon - 22-Jan-08 21:04 

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ..
Sort:

Close

Enter email to receive updates:RSS Feed

Twitter