Inefficient banking systems
This is the second time I've been charged a penalty fee thanks to inefficient banking systems and I'm fuming about it. I paid the balance on my Nationwide credit card 3 days ago, but checking online I see that it hasn't arrived there yet. Since today is the payment date I'm going to be hit with a £12 charge. I rang up the bank and offered to pay the minimum balance using my debit card.
Their response was, "sorry we don't have that facility". I couldn't believe my ears! How convenient! Why can't Nationwide do what millions of retailers do daily and charge my debit card?
I then suggested that since my mortgage account with them has a rather large credit, that they could take the minimum payment from that instead. Surely its just a simple account to account transfer within the same bank?
The response was predictable though. "Oh, no sir, we can't do that. It would take at least 3 working days to do the transfer!" Is that my problem or theirs? Why does it take so long?
On the slim chance that the money I transferred might appear today, I asked them at what time the transfers are received. They said midnight. Then I asked, is that considered to be today or tomorrow? Of course, it was tomorrow and so the £12 penalty fee applies regardless!
Now more than ever I'm convinced that the bankers are just sitting in their offices laughing at us, sure in the knowledge that there's nothing we can do; for they have all the power and we have none.
By: Mtspark
Comments from visitors
We moved house six weeks ago and in consequence had to inform 30 or so entities (banks, building societies DVLA etc) of our change of address. This was more problematic in some cases than in others, however after perseverance the exercise was completed, with one exception Natwest (the helpful bank). The latter operates what they optimistically call customer service via call centre(s).
I have an an online account and after the usual security can access same and if I were so inclined could close it online, One action however cannot be carried out 'for security reasons', is change of address. For this I need to visit a branch with proof of identity and a photograph, which I am not prepared to do.
Since my debit card for this account is linked to my previous address I have had the card declined. Thanks very much to the helpful bank a subsidiary of RBS and fully manned by jobsworths led by inept managers.
Stupid banking system - 11-Jun-10 13:11
I think if it will be taking 5 working days then why couldn't the money stay in my ledger balance which I cant touch it is my money let it stay in my account till it is processed or whatever if it leaves my account then it should be in the recipient's account. I am so frustrated & gutted with this lame unprofessional bank.
Fear knocked on the door, fait - 30-Dec-09 15:31
Finally the loser is be at the receiving end, the Customer.
Insurance companies are just as greedy.
Bank ads make my blood boil! - 7-Mar-09 08:28
Banks which insist on this nightmare I will close my account with no matter how good their interest is. The whole logging on procedure has to be simplified.
Security Test Failure - 9-Jan-08 22:17
Why, if you are using the internet banking service, does it take 4 working days to move your money? Why isn't it instantaneous?
I'll tell you why. Once the banks get your money by whatever means they have a monopoly on it. They want to keep it for as long as possible. During the 4 days they use when you try to transfer it, they are manaufacturing a huge profit from your funds.
Demand payment for this interest, or instant transfer. Banks have no right to keep your money longer than necessary. There should be consumer legislation and protection on this.
Make the Banks Pay - 9-Jan-08 22:16
This might not appear to help the person paying fees for late payment or slow clearing, but it's all part of the same picture. It is possible to change things, but banks are big and so it will take an enormous shove to get their attention.
In reality it will take a large group of customers to walk away from one of the main banks and not go back until things change massively in their favour. You keep your account, just don't use it. So if Barclays customers left them in droves and they obtained no new customers from other banks, that would eventually force Barclays to change. If Barclays changed as much as customers demanded, then they could go back to Barclays. All the banks would then be very reluctant to take you for granted again, they'd be pretty dim if they tried. I worked for them for 17 years before taking redundancy seven years ago, I know. It doesn't have to be Barclays, they're all as bad as each other.
What customers need is someone to organise this customer cause. Anyone up for it?





