Smokers have rights too
13-May-2008
*
* Your Gripe Gripe List Quick Gripe Comments Gripe Poll About Us Site Map Resources Home *
*   *
 

Smokers have rights too

Bookmarking, Google, Yahoo, MSN, Digg, Delicious, Redit, Furl and many more Add To Any >> 
Feedburner Subscribe to feed >> 
Other Related Gripes >> 
Email To A Friend >> 

 
 

Smokers have rights too and I'm fed up with the way we are now seen as second class citizens.  As you may know, smoking in Scotland has now been banned.  We are all pushed outside with little facilities to shelter ourselves in.  Non-smokers claimed that they had nowhere to go to because if they went into a pub they would die several years later because of the inconsiderate people around them.

Come on, it's not like it's a surprise that people are going to be smoking there.  But this is not the worst part of it.  No, it’s actually the government that I really want to have a gripe at.  For example forcing this ban on local businesses, I don't see as fair at all!

Who are they to interfere with how a person should run their own lives.  Why not offer incentives to become no smoking venues, grants for better ventilation.  I'm sure that the government could do this just by cutting down their spending in other areas.

Smokers have rights too

The adverts they place on the TV portray people who smoke as penniless, clumsy lepers to be avoided at all costs.  After all who would want to be around us smelly, grubby people?  I feel that us smokers are the easy targets, after all it's easier to get votes by banning smoking rather than preventing knife or drug related crimes.

Well, for all the non smokers out there here's my conclusion.  I smoke and I like to smoke.  I also know that it causes cancer, I am not stupid.  Now we can live in a world where groups are segregated even more and we can all sit in pubs which smell of sweat, vomit and urine.  Ah, the great country that is Scotland.

By: ScubaSteve


Other Related Gripes

This smoking ban is just too much
Thoughts from a smoker
Heading towards a police state?
I am a man not a number
Disgusting standards of hygiene in pubs
Young drinkers ignore real ale
America should ban smoking too
Democracy or Dictatorship?
Smokers are inconsiderate
My Scottish money not good enough
No alcohol free beer in pubs
Ban smoking in public places
British pub closing time




Sponsored Links


Visitor Comments

Please read this before you post

Enter your comments in the space below

Name or nickname


Remember my name



 
Ummm, I am enjoying this cicarette!
Oh...just a second...I put it in the ashtray.

I want this smoking ban lifted or smokers should pay less tax for being penalised.

We go to a restaurant and are told to go outside to smoke - very well, only I want to pay less then.

Fair?
*SuperBambinoCattivo  01-May-2008 23:45

 
Smokers do tell non smokers what to do. They tell us we should breathe in their foul smoke. Smokers do bully non smokers when the non smoker is coughing and rasping. Keep ya foul habit in ya own doors. That's the fair answer.
*Digsy  01-May-2008 13:56

 
why dont You just leave smokers alone they dont tell you what to do they so just leave them ALONE!!!!!!
*blakey  01-May-2008 13:49

 
Smokers have the right to kill and poison themselves if they wish.

They do not have the right to impose the filthy stinking residue of their foul and and antisocial habit on the rest of us.

Once they realise this and are able to reconcile their use of the drug to which they are addicted to the above guidelines, we will all be happy.
*MikeP  01-May-2008 13:24

 
non smokers are always telling smokers what to do they have no right telling them what to to smokersdont tell non smokers what to do so just leave the smokers to do what everthey want non smokers are just acting like bullies
*blakey  01-May-2008 13:17

 
Smokers do have rights and no one can say that they dont.
*blakey  01-May-2008 13:15

 
Smokers do not have rights.
Their obnoxious habit is fine as long as they puff away in their own home.

But they dont want that. They want to make everyone smell and and cough and splutter while they puff away to their (cancer ridden) hearts content!

If the smoker could just smoke in their own home, no harm done (just to themselves), but they wont! Thats why smokers should not have rights!!

At least heroin addicts have the common decency to 'jack up' in private!!
*Fed up!  15-Apr-2008 20:51

 
Go on! Hang these signs up in your local pub.

http://tinyurl.com/yogy2j
or
http://www.amerc.es/tabaco6.jpg

Esta Permitido
Fumar
Tabaco
En Este Establicimiento
*Campaign for a Free Land  29-Mar-2008 12:30

 
I think its good that they banned smoking but I think that they should lift hunting as I go hunting sometimes and the hounds are so amazing that they shouldnt be killed as it is a waste of animals please help me
*hunting girl!!!  03-Mar-2008 10:24

 
Accepting the smoking ban without thinking is accepting the divine right of authority. You are a yesman. Unfortunately in my experience of dealing with others 95% of people are yesmen. It is extremely difficult once authority has pronounced on a view, whether they had any real evidence or justice for that view, to shift or budge people from the point of view that authority was right. The smoking ban is a clear instance of this. People accept Government was right even if it was not. This is sick. The governed play into the hands of those in authority when they do this. Sick.
*Wrong Arm of the Law  21-Feb-2008 06:05

 
The truth about banning mobile phones on planes. Look how similar the case is to secondhand smoking and the myth that it causes harm.

...
As a result of these and other investigations, Boeing has not been able to find a definite correlation between PEDs and the associated reported airplane anomalies.

...

ABC News 20/20 aired a report in December 2007 trying to get to the bottom of the ban on cell phone use on aircraft. They interviewed one of the authors of the IEEE Spectrum report, but also noted that this study was not designed to actually detect interference, only that cellphones are not switched off sometimes. The report concludes that the primary reason for the ban on cell phone use in flight is that neither the FAA nor the FCC are willing to spend the money to perform conclusive safety tests. They have left this up to the airlines, who do not see any return on investment in paying for such tests. According to the 20/20 website, ABC News consultant and veteran airline pilot John J. Nance states categorically:

There's little reason to worry about cell phones interfering with an airplane's navigational equipment. Nance says an airplane's electronic systems are "all heavily shielded. That means that stray signals cannot get into those systems."
*We are ruled by liars  19-Feb-2008 08:40

 
Freddie got it right. The smoking ban in quite the majority of cases is wholly unnecessary. It's like the way they ban the use of mobile telephones on airplanes - because they purportedly interfere with the aircraft's controls: What total and complete nonsense! If there was the slightest chance that a mobile phone would really interfere they would confiscate them before your flew.

There are too many fascists and control freaks running our lives.
*Stop the Ban  19-Feb-2008 08:28


View more comments on this gripe


 
*   *
* © 2000-2008 The Weekly Gripe. All rights reserved. Please see our privacy policy and disclaimer. *