Loading
 

Health and Safety at work - my office chair

I go to work each day and spend most of my time in a very ordinary looking open plan office doing a fairly typical office job sat at a desk with a computer.  Then one day a large important looking man came into our office and said he was going to carry out work place assessments to ensure that we comply with health and safety regulations.

He came over to my desk and asked if he could "observe my working practices for the next few minutes".  After a short time he told me that I wasn’t sitting properly, my phone was not properly positioned and my monitor was at the wrong angle.

He then showed me how to sit at my desk properly (having used a chair for the last 28 or so years of my life I thought I had it covered), how to hold my mouse correctly and the correct position for my screen.  I know this is done to avoid RSI etc.  and after a quick chat and a bit of a telling off I had to sign a form to say that I had read the guidelines on "using my workspace".  He then set off to assess the next member of staff.

A regular open plan office, health and safety regulations Then the very next day he came back in and we all have to learn how to lift a cardboard box in the correct fashion.  Of course all this was to make sure we comply with those health and safety regulations.  Personally I thought it was all a bit silly.

However it turns out my chair actually isn’t any good for me and a new one has been ordered at a cost of around £500!  I have to say it is much more comfy than the old one, but it’s come out of our budget and my manager is fuming with me now!

I think that money was earmarked for the Christmas party or something, so now I’m the least favourite person in my team and all because some bloke said I slouched a bit!

So don’t worry about the leaky pipe in the gents, or that gas like smell coming form the basement storage on the first floor or the crazy employee that insists on driving into the company car park at 100mph, hand braking to a stop inches from the car next to him.  Don’t worry about the bloke who regularly has a quick out by the fire exit or indeed the dubious looking cleaner that you are sure is nicking stuff from your desk.

Oh no, you want to make sure you sit at your desk in the correct manner!

By: Billy no wages

Share on Google Plus

Comments from visitors

Post a comment

Enter your comments in the space below.

Name or nickname


Page: 1 2
Sort:

the health and safety morons should **** off and get a life, they have no idea what they are doing they are just another product of the neurosis of our mindless society

-7

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

cj - 25-Feb-11 07:57 

Kit, bad luck with the knee. I'd hate it if I couldn't use my back chair!

Unfortunately I don't know about whether they help hip problems, but I can't see how they would be harmful as your hips are not as bent when you're sitting on one as they are on an ordinary chair.

-8

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 24-Oct-10 09:09 

grumpyoldwoman,

I had one of those but had to stop using it after I tore the meniscus disc in my knee. The knee seems to have settled now, although it took years to do so.

Do you happen to know if "back chairs" are helpful or harmful for hip joint problems?

-1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Kit - 23-Oct-10 17:48 

On a serious note, although I think I may be repeating myself, I sit quite alot in my job and used to get lower and upper back problems.

The osteopath I went to recommended a "back chair" (the ones with a seat at an angle and another bit to put your knees on). The company bought me one for about £40 (not £500!) and I have no trouble since.

I don't think that any chair, even a £500 one, will make you sit in the correct posture for your back unless it is of this design.

Regarding the general subject of H&S at work; the grumpyoldman says if it gets any worse he will have to produce a method statement for using the on site loos. (He didn't quite put it like that though!)

-8

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 23-Oct-10 10:23 

David; "Xmas parties funds should not be part of company purchase orders for equipment and safety."

It all comes out of company funds! Do you really think small companies can afford to put aside money just for safety equipment these days? If they need to buy something unexpected they have to do without something else.

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 23-Oct-10 09:18 

In the old days there was none of this health and safety nonsense, an individual workman had enough pride to take responsibility for his own individual safety needs. There was no screaming for compensation every time he needed a plaster.

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

old but still grumpy - 22-Oct-10 22:52 

Let me guess,there's also a field for lifting boxes,eh David?

-9

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

DSG - 22-Oct-10 19:12 

"I saw no proof that the other factors you state regarding gas smells and idiots driving so fast into the carpark were no goiing to be addressed."It's called sarcasm David,if you're really this stupid!

-4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

DSG - 22-Oct-10 19:10 

"What were the consequencies of not sitting correctly?" Does this man (or woman) live on planet earth?

-8

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

DSG - 22-Oct-10 12:38 

hey DAVIDJOHN! Not all people are as stupid as you! We don't need retards like you telling us how to sit "properly"without getting back pain,or how to lift boxes without dropping them! Some of us actually USE common sense in these situations,but retards like you throw all common sense out the window! Plus,sitting on a chair or lifting a box is not overly complicated,you know! ANY idiot can do both those things without retards like YOU telling US what to do! So don't worry if hard-earned company money is spent on some stupid $500 chair,as long as ONE employee doesn't have chronic back pain(!)

+4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

DSG - 22-Oct-10 12:34 

All of you braindead numpties who ACTUALLY enforce this health and safety BS should be rounded up and wiped off the polluted face of the earth!

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

DSG - 16-Oct-10 18:47 

health and safety is promoted and enforced by spineless socialists with a marxist agenda...everybody has a price...health and safety inspectors are on a good wack and will turn into hypercrites to justify their job and carefully single out circumstances and individuals to criticize. Once your backs turned their as bad if not worse than any body else. People are routinely performanced out of their job if they take a stand against health and safety. Yet this is the catch 22....stress in the work place is the numero uno of health and safety problems at work......watch out Mr Health and safety the tables are turning.

-3

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

adunuf. - 23-Sep-10 19:35 

I did a health and safety course once, and as part of that course was shown how to lift a box correctly "Lift with your legs, not your back etc etc" The only problem was that the box was empty and weighed no more than a few grams and you could easily pick it up with your thumb and forefinger! But we had to pretend it was full and do as the guy said or we would not get the health and safety certificate, which in turn would mean losing your job. How petty is that!

-14

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

anon - 15-Sep-10 16:00 

Okay Billy no wages and company lets take a look at what you wrote shall we?
First of all the way you sit and position your VDU has an afect on your posture and all the talk of common sense did not make you position your desk correctly did it? You had to be shown. What were the consequencies of not sitting correctly ? well chronic aching back pain is one for a start which would mean in a few years down the line you losing time of work which would cost your employer more than buying you a chair right now. In your story I saw no proof that the other factors you state regarding gas smells and idiots driving so fast into the carpark were no goiing to be addressed. This man was a specialist within the field he conducted his survey into. Under the HSAW act 1974 it is your duty to report the gas smell and driving at speed problem so you should not complain it is not being sorted if you have not reported it.
If your employer/manager is picking on you for receiving equipment that prevents ill health due to bad backs then he is at fault, as he is begrudging you the correct equipment for carrying out your duties injust the same way as giving you a computer enables you to carry out your duties. You have fallen into a false sense of what is working equipment and not realised being safe from accidents, and ergonomic illnesses and stress is all part of modern working life. We have gone a long way from the days that employees had to suffer so that the employer could make more profits. Xmas parties funds should not be part of company purchase orders for equipment and safety.

+2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

DAVIDJOHN - 15-Dec-09 14:38 

Thanks a lot for such a nice posting . I appreciate it .

http://www.justblogme.com/workworkwork/258369/Workplace+Safety+Issues.html

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Cherry Emery - 24-Sep-09 11:26 

This is really a nice story . Yah sure I am in a better position nothing to worry about . I don't want to waste money on that type of silly tips .
http://www.justblogme.com/workworkwork/256007/Tips+on+Workplace+Safety.html

+7

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Cherry Emery - 22-Sep-09 08:33 

Health and Safety at work. Just one of the ways the Government is trying to wreck this country altogether. It's just a load of bullspit dreamed up by these politically correct, hi-vis wearing clowns. The way I see it, if you are thick enough to stick your hand into a dough mixer, wire a plug whilst standing in a jacuzzi or work under a truck that is propped up with a laundry basket, then you shouldn't be allowed into society altogether!!

-7

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

J Clarkson - 30-Jul-09 22:21 

It's certainly daft!

If you visited a building site today you would probably be amazed to find that as many, if not more, people are working in offices (nice & cool no doubt) on site as there are builders actually doing the job. The office workers are there to implement things like health & safety and environmental policies as well as all the stuff actually necessary to getting the job done.

Yet still nobody is capable of thinking things through!

I could show you "safety" goggles with which you could seriously damage your eyes! They are made in one piece with the arms shut so that you have to pull them apart to put the goggles on. If you happened to try to take them off with one hand by grasping them in the middle at the bridge of your nose the arms would snap shut and the ends of the arms could scrape across your eyeballs in the process!!

Risk assessments are unfortunately done a long way ahead of the job, which doesn't help either.

-4

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 1-Jul-09 15:11 

grumpy old woman

The situation sounds daft to me.

In this particular situation the principal contractor has not implemented the provisions of CDM (Construction Design & Management Regulations) or general H&S law and guidance correctly.

Risk assessments must be be specific to each task dependant upon the circumstances and if the contractor has merely implemented a blanket policy irrespective of site conditions and hazards (such as the current heat wave) then he will be found negligent should one of the workers fall ill with heatstroke, dehydration or other heat related symptoms.

The 'numpty' who is insisting on the current regime needs to undertake a course of education as soon as possible.

-2

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

Manx Hound. - 1-Jul-09 14:11 

Re Manx Hound's comment; we are the employers but the decision on PPE is taken by the main contractor on the site and it is in our contract with them that we play by their rules.

In this case they are a company which does some work in quarries, where reflective clothing is now standard. Some numpty decided that it made sense (!) for ALL their sites to be covered by the same regulations, so even though the job is actually a building in the middle of a town all the reflective clothing has to be worn! It is not remotely necessary for this particular job; but the jobsworths have no latitude.

One of the men nearly got thrown off the site a couple of weeks ago for taking one glove off to look at the drawings!

+1

 Vote for this commentVote against this commentClick to rate  Report This Report

grumpyoldwoman - 1-Jul-09 13:50 

Page: 1 2
Sort:

Close

Enter email to receive updates:RSS Feed

Twitter