Media censorship on the Daily Mail
|
I'm getting a little fed up with the Daily Mail website. When I'm posting comments on some of the stories they are censored even though what I'm saying is a valid point. One story appeared recently saying that there is research out saying chest x-rays are not always successful in diagnosing early stage lung cancer and that some patients may need to go back for further x-rays. Someone commented that this is yet more evidence that the NHS was a complete failure. |
|
|
As an x-ray student I thought I'd reply and put the message straight. I said that this is a piece of research which is pointing out that our current methods of diagnosing lung cancer are not always successful and should be taken on board so we can improve best practice. Did my comment get published? No! The Mail says that education standards are falling. Well, if they are going to encourage incorrect viewpoints on their website and not publish anything from anyone who looks like they know what they're talking about, I'm not surprised that people are lacking in the grey cells department! By: James |
|
Comments from visitors
Similar to that creature Cole, are they also being paid (this time by the BBC) to go on and on and on about that god-awful Shitley Prancing show of a Saturday night?
Talk about Dumb Britain.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/3842933/Cheryl-Cole-Coming-up-for-a-night-rap.html
And now she's.....*drum roll*....texting!
Doesn't get any more thrilling than this.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/x_factor/3844152/Cheryl-Coles-final-show-on-X-Factor-USA.html
So it's news even when she STOPS doing something?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/x_factor/3844152/Cheryl-Coles-final-show-on-X-Factor-USA.html
It's apparently news even when she STOPS doing something??
Trash.
Soaring national debt? Crippling fuel prices? Desperate and harrowing concerns in Japan? Nah, why notl mince on about Kate Middleton's fashion sense or Peaches Geldof in whatever club she has fallen out of lately...
It makes you wonder who the editors, newspaper owners, politicans, and banksters really work for ...
Thomas the Whiner - 16-Mar-11 13:34
You know, important stuff.
We want our money back - 30-Jan-11 20:16
Useless third = all "Showbusiness Reporters" is a great way to start.
Then Hello and Heat magazine "employees". Then all of ITV and SKY. The list is plentiful!
The Daily Fail actually takes it self seriously. As if anyone with two brain cells to rub together believes its sanctimonious drivel as unfortunately, like most media, it thinks it "speaks for the people".
This notwithstanding their regular puff pieces by (and what a more useless description of employment I can't imagine) endless streams of "showbusiness reporters" about some useless human detritus photographed at a beach/club/shop etc etc. And then heartlessly criticise them. Showbusiness reporters...... if there's anything society needs less I cannot imagine.
Tawdry excuse for a newspaper.
You are absolutely right - Daily Mail comment censorship is rife. There are a number of things you can't mention - JP Morgan, Sky, de-select MPs, and many, many more.
andy.





