Junk mail from banks

I just stuff their return envelope with junk mail from OTHER senders of Junk Mail.

Srart writing "return to sender" on them & stick them back in the post! They may eventually get fed up with sending them.

Local authorities plan to charge you on how much rubbish is in your bin. So why not charge the distributors of junk mail for handling their mail. There is no upper limmit in law for what you can charge for doing or suffering anything you are not legally obliged to do or suffer at your own expense. The only AT YOUR OWN EXPENSE authority we have found is in the 1911 Copyright Act section 15 and it only applies to publishers.

Compliments trustee@ichortrust.co.uk

By the way did you know at the bottom of the credit card letter there is a code which is also on the return envelope which is a code that tells them who you are even if you take the code out of the letter it's still printed on the return envelope.

Junk mail from banks is destined for sub-prime people as they are so gullible.

There is no law that states you must handle unsolicited mail AT YOUR OWN EXPENSE.

We know how to scare the banks off by offering them a massive fee for handling their junk (unsolicited) mail.

Get smart why sighn for anything when your signature is worth either what you say it is cash befor you sighn or you don't sighn.

Interested contact trustee@ichortrust.co.uk

And the post office should also be required to publicise the fact that you can opt out by e-mail - the address is optout@royalmail.co.uk

If this doesn't work, maybe the post office will get the message if people put their post office junk mail back into the red post office letter box rather than their own bin. The post office won't want the postal system to grind to a halt under the burden of junk mail or the cost of employing extra sorting staff to make sure it does not. And as commercial waste is charged for the post office will then pay for the cost of disposing of their waste rather than the local authority (and the council taxpayer).

Found this on the BBC News site "Postman sacked over junk mail row - A Nottinghamshire postman who refused to deliver junk mail has been sacked. Royal Mail had suspended Steve Rowbotham pending an investigation "relating to the wilful delay of mail". Residents of Burton Joyce had called for their postman to be reinstated and wrote to his bosses demanding that he be cleared." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/nottinghamshire/6757903.stm

What a great idea! If only our postie would censor all the junk mail we get from banks!

I play these spammers at their own game. I save up usually a month or so's worth of junk mail, then I stuff it into one of the return envelopes. I then walk to the nearest pillar box and post it through the slot. I then walk away sniggering!

90% of the junk mail we receive is not for us at all. It's all for a scammer who has discovered they can make money by filling in internet request forms, using other people's addresses. We have reported this to the Police. They are not interested. It's not a crime they say. But everyday we receive 20 unwanted items of mail for credit, loans, this and that.

We have to spend valuable time and money ridding ourselves of all the waste this generates. It fills our dustbin, and costs our local council money to dispose of it.

Companies who trade on the internet must identify the full source of the requests they receive. Make them fully traceable.

Better yet, just mail back the reply envelope without anything in it. A wasted stamp for the credit company everytime!!! Maybe if they get enough of them, they might stop.

Would also keep several more postman in employment and overtime.Only problem is it may fill the postboxes and sorting offices up.